The Essential Role of Schools in Supporting LGBTQIA+ Students

The Imperative to Support LGBTQIA+ Students in Schools

Schools serve as foundational environments for the academic, social, and emotional development of all young people. For students who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, or with other diverse sexual orientations and gender identities (LGBTQIA+), the school environment holds particular significance. It can be a place of affirmation, belonging, and growth, or conversely, a site of hostility, exclusion, and harm. Ensuring that schools are safe, supportive, and affirming spaces for LGBTQIA+ students is not merely an optional enhancement but a fundamental necessity for educational equity and student well-being. The increasing visibility and self-awareness of LGBTQIA+ youth ¹ underscore the urgent need for educational institutions to implement informed, evidence-based support systems. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the multifaceted role schools play in supporting LGBTQIA+ students, drawing upon research and established best practices to illuminate the challenges these students face and the strategies schools can employ to foster truly inclusive learning environments.

This analysis will delve into the critical components necessary for creating such environments. It begins by defining the spectrum of LGBTQIA+ identities and outlining the pervasive challenges—including discrimination, bullying, and significant mental health disparities—that these students frequently encounter within school settings. Subsequently, the report examines the documented impact of school climate, contrasting the outcomes associated with supportive versus unsupportive environments. It then identifies and analyzes the essential elements of effective school policies and administrative practices, including comprehensive non-discrimination and anti-bullying measures, procedures for affirming names and pronouns, and equitable access to facilities. Furthermore, the report explores how curriculum across various subjects can be developed to be inclusive and representative of LGBTQIA+ experiences.

The indispensable role of school personnel—teachers, counselors, administrators, and support staff—and the necessity of targeted professional development will be detailed. The function and impact of student organizations like Gender-Sexuality Alliances (GSAs) will be examined, alongside the relevant legal frameworks (such as Title IX and the Equal Access Act) and ethical considerations guiding schools’ responsibilities. Finally, the report investigates common obstacles and controversies encountered during the implementation of LGBTQIA+ support initiatives and explores strategies for navigating these challenges effectively. These elements are deeply interconnected ³, and addressing them holistically is paramount to creating schools where every LGBTQIA+ student can thrive.

I. Understanding the Landscape: LGBTQIA+ Students and School Environments

A. Defining the Spectrum: LGBTQIA+ Identities and Terminology

Establishing a foundation of understanding and respect within schools begins with language. Familiarity with the terms LGBTQIA+ individuals use to describe their identities and experiences is crucial for educators and administrators seeking to create affirming environments.⁵ It is vital to recognize that language itself is dynamic; terms evolve, gain new meanings, or fall out of use over time.⁵ Moreover, identity is deeply personal, and the most respectful approach involves using the names, pronouns, and identity terms that students affirm for themselves.⁷ While mastering an ever-expanding vocabulary is less critical than the practice of respect, a working knowledge of core concepts is essential.

At the heart of these discussions are fundamental concepts of gender and sexual orientation. Gender is understood not simply as biological sex assigned at birth, but as a social construct encompassing cultural identities, expressions, and roles, often codified as feminine or masculine.⁵ Individuals may accept, reject, or modify the gender assigned to them based on interpretations of their bodies.⁵ This understanding gives rise to several key terms:

Gender Identity: An individual’s internal sense of being male, female, both, neither, or somewhere else along the gender spectrum.⁵
Gender Expression: The external manifestation of one’s gender identity, often through clothing, hairstyle, mannerisms, and other characteristics.¹⁰
Cisgender: Describes individuals whose gender identity aligns with the sex assigned to them at birth.¹⁰
Transgender: An umbrella term for people whose gender identity differs from the sex assigned at birth.⁵ The process of aligning one’s life and/or body with one’s gender identity is often called transitioning, which varies greatly among individuals.⁷
Nonbinary: An identity embraced by individuals who do not identify exclusively as male or female; they may identify as both, neither, or another gender entirely.¹³ Related terms include genderqueer, gender fluid, agender, gender-expansive, and gender diverse.¹⁰
Affirmed Gender: The gender by which an individual wishes to be known.¹⁰
AFAB/AMAB: Acronyms for Assigned Female at Birth / Assigned Male at Birth.¹¹

Sexual Orientation refers to an individual’s inner feelings of emotional, romantic, and/or physical attraction to others in relation to their own gender identity.⁵ Common identities include lesbian (women attracted to women), gay (often men attracted to men, but can be used more broadly), bisexual (attraction to more than one gender, often men and women), pansexual (attraction regardless of gender), asexual (lack of sexual attraction), and straight (heterosexual).⁵ The term queer is often used as an umbrella term or specific identity, sometimes reclaimed from its historical use as a slur.⁵ The spectrum nature of attraction is also reflected in terms like demisexual (sexual attraction only after emotional bond) and aromantic (lack of romantic attraction).¹¹

The acronym LGBTQIA+ stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and/or Questioning, Intersex (referring to people born with sex characteristics that do not fit typical binary notions of male or female bodies), and Asexual/Aromantic/Agender. Variations like LGBTIQA or LGBTQIA2S+ exist, with the latter explicitly including Two-Spirit individuals, a term specific to some Indigenous North American cultures encompassing diverse gender and sexual identities.¹⁰

Other important concepts include:

Coming Out: The ongoing process by which an individual recognizes their own sexual orientation and/or gender identity and chooses to share it with others.⁵ This is not a one-time event.
Ally: An individual, often cisgender and heterosexual, who supports and advocates for the rights and inclusion of LGBTQIA+ people.¹⁰
Chosen Family: Non-biological support networks that are crucial for many LGBTQIA+ individuals, especially if their biological families are unsupportive.¹¹
Oppression: Systems of power and privilege that benefit some groups over others, manifesting ideologically, institutionally, interpersonally, and internally.⁵
Heteronormativity/Heterosexism: The assumption that heterosexuality is the default, normal, or superior orientation, leading to the marginalization of other orientations.¹⁰
Cisnormativity/Cissexism: The assumption that being cisgender is the norm, leading to the marginalization of transgender and nonbinary people.¹¹
Homophobia/Transphobia/Biphobia: Fear, hostility, or prejudice directed towards gay/lesbian, transgender, or bisexual people, respectively.¹⁰
Reclaimed Words: Terms previously used as slurs (e.g., “queer,” “dyke”) that some within the community have reclaimed as terms of pride and resilience.⁵ It’s crucial to note that not all members of the community embrace these terms.⁵

Organizations such as PFLAG (Parents, Families, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays), GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network), and HRC (Human Rights Campaign) provide valuable resources, glossaries, and support for understanding this evolving terminology.⁵

The complexity and personal nature of these terms ⁵ underscore that the primary responsibility for educators is not rote memorization, but the consistent practice of respect. This involves actively listening to students, using the names and pronouns they affirm for themselves ⁷, and demonstrating a willingness to learn and correct mistakes. Using outdated or inappropriate language, such as “homosexual” instead of gay or lesbian, “sexual preference” instead of sexual orientation, referring to being LGBTQ+ as a “lifestyle” ⁶, or using offensive terms like “hermaphrodite” for intersex individuals ¹¹, can inadvertently signal bias or a lack of current understanding, undermining efforts to create an inclusive atmosphere. The focus must be on affirming the individual student’s identity as they define it.

Table 1: Key LGBTQIA+ Terminology

Term	Definition	Sources
Gender Identity	An individual’s internal, deeply held sense of their gender (e.g., male, female, both, neither, or somewhere else along the spectrum). Distinct from sex assigned at birth.	⁵
Gender Expression	The external ways an individual manifests their gender identity, through clothing, hairstyle, mannerisms, voice, etc. May or may not conform to societal expectations.	¹⁰
Sexual Orientation	An individual’s enduring physical, romantic, and/or emotional attraction to other people, relative to their own gender identity.	⁵
Cisgender	Describes a person whose gender identity aligns with the sex they were assigned at birth.	¹⁰
Transgender	An umbrella term for people whose gender identity differs from the sex they were assigned at birth.	⁵
Nonbinary	An umbrella term for gender identities that are not solely male or female. Includes identities like genderqueer, genderfluid, agender.	¹³
Ally	A person (often cisgender and heterosexual) who supports and advocates for the rights and equality of LGBTQIA+ people.	¹⁰
Coming Out	The ongoing process of recognizing one’s own LGBTQIA+ identity and choosing to share it with others.	⁵
LGBTQIA+	Acronym for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning, Intersex, Asexual/Aromantic/Agender, and others. Represents diverse sexual orientations & gender identities.	¹⁰

B. The Reality of Risk: Common Challenges Faced in Schools (Bullying, Harassment, Discrimination Statistics)

Despite growing societal awareness, schools across the United States frequently remain hostile environments for LGBTQIA+ students.² Research consistently documents that a distressing number of these students routinely encounter biased language, harassment, assault, and discriminatory policies and practices, contributing significantly to negative school experiences.¹³

Anti-LGBTQIA+ remarks are pervasive. Students report frequently hearing homophobic slurs like “fag” or “dyke,” the derogatory use of “gay” (e.g., “that’s so gay”), and phrases like “no homo”.²⁷ Negative comments about gender expression (e.g., individuals not acting “masculine” or “feminine” enough) and transgender people (e.g., using slurs like “tranny”) are also widespread.²⁷ Alarmingly, this biased language is not limited to peers; a significant number of students report hearing homophobic remarks (58.0% in 2021 GLSEN survey) and negative remarks about gender expression (72.0% in 2021) from teachers or other school staff.³ In some states, the reported frequency of hearing anti-LGBTQ remarks from school adults saw dramatic increases between 2019 and 2021.²⁸ This prevalence, particularly from adults in positions of authority, suggests that anti-LGBTQIA+ sentiment is often a normalized, ambient part of the school environment, contributing to a hostile climate even beyond overt acts of aggression. Addressing this requires tackling not just explicit bullying but the underlying culture of bias reflected in casual language and microaggressions.

Beyond biased language, LGBTQIA+ students experience high rates of harassment and assault. Verbal harassment based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression (SOGIE) is common.¹⁷ Physical harassment (being pushed or shoved) and physical assault (being punched, kicked, or injured with a weapon) based on SOGIE also occur at concerning rates.¹⁷ The 2021 GLSEN National School Climate Survey (NSCS) found 31.2% of LGBTQ+ students were physically harassed based on SOGIE in the past year.²⁷ Cyberbullying is another significant threat, with high rates reported globally and in the U.S..¹⁷ LGBTQIA+ youth are bullied at significantly higher rates than their heterosexual and cisgender peers ²⁹, and bias-based bullying targeting SOGIE is linked to poorer outcomes than general bullying.⁴⁰ Personal narratives vividly illustrate the severity and impact of this victimization.²³

Discrimination manifests not only through interpersonal interactions but also through school policies and practices. Students report being disciplined differently for public displays of affection (PDA) compared to non-LGBTQIA+ peers, being prevented from discussing LGBTQIA+ topics in assignments or extracurriculars, and facing restrictions based on their gender identity.⁷ Common discriminatory practices include preventing students from using their affirmed names and pronouns, denying access to bathrooms and locker rooms consistent with their gender identity, enforcing gendered dress codes, and restricting participation in sports.¹² Transgender and nonbinary students experience these forms of discrimination at particularly high rates.¹² Some students also believe they receive harsher discipline simply because staff perceive them as LGBTQIA+.¹⁴

The cumulative effect of this hostility is a pervasive sense of insecurity. A majority of LGBTQIA+ students report feeling unsafe at school specifically because of their sexual orientation, gender expression, or gender.¹⁷ This fear leads many to avoid certain school spaces, most commonly bathrooms, locker rooms, and physical education classes.²¹ Significant numbers also avoid school functions and extracurricular activities.²⁷ Consequently, many LGBTQIA+ students miss school days due to feeling unsafe or uncomfortable ²¹, and a notable percentage report changing schools altogether because of the hostile environment.¹⁴

Compounding these issues is a lack of effective response when victimization occurs. A majority of LGBTQIA+ students who experience harassment or assault in school do not report the incident to school staff.²¹ The most common reason for not reporting is the belief that staff would not take action or address the situation effectively.²⁷ Data supports this perception: when incidents are reported, a majority of students state that school staff did nothing in response or simply told the student to ignore the behavior.²¹ This significant gap between the experience of victimization and the trust in reporting mechanisms points to a systemic failure. It suggests that past negative experiences or a pervasive belief that the school’s protective systems are ineffective or unresponsive discourages students from seeking help, thereby perpetuating cycles of harm. Rebuilding this trust requires schools to demonstrably improve their response protocols and ensure that reporting leads to meaningful intervention and support.

These challenges are often amplified for students holding multiple marginalized identities. LGBTQIA+ students of color face the dual burden of racism and anti-LGBTQIA+ bias, experiencing victimization based on both their race/ethnicity and their SOGIE.¹³ Similarly, LGBTQIA+ students with disabilities encounter ableism alongside SOGIE-based discrimination and report high rates of victimization related to their disability status.¹³ Understanding these intersecting oppressions is crucial for developing truly effective support strategies.

Table 2: Summary Statistics: Challenges Faced by LGBTQIA+ Students in U.S. Schools

Challenge Indicator	Statistic	Source(s)
Feeling Unsafe at School (due to SOGIE)	68.0% felt unsafe (50.6% due to SO, 43.2% due to GE, 40.3% due to G)	²⁷
Hearing Biased Remarks (Frequently/Often)	Homophobic remarks (students): 67.5% (Native/Indigenous) – 87% (Texas); Negative Gender Expression remarks (students): 61.6% (Native/Indigenous) – 90% (Texas); Transphobic remarks (students): 51.7% (Native/Indigenous) – 84% (Wisconsin)	²⁷
Hearing Biased Remarks from Staff	Homophobic: 58.0%; Negative Gender Expression: 72.0%	²⁷
Verbal Harassment (In-Person, based on SOGIE)	76.1% experienced in past year (60.7% based on SO, 57.4% based on GE, 51.3% based on G)	²⁷
Physical Harassment (In-Person, based on SOGIE)	31.2% experienced in past year (22.4% based on SO, 20.6% based on GE, 20.5% based on G)	²⁷
Physical Assault (In-Person, based on SOGIE)	12.5% experienced in past year (8.8% based on SO, 8.2% based on GE, 8.3% based on G)	²⁷
Cyberbullying (Past Year)	42% (Middle/High School); 35% (Ages 13-17); 24% (Ages 18-24)	³⁵
Experienced Discriminatory Policies/Practices	58.9% (GLSEN 2021); 62.2% (GLSEN 2017)	²⁵
Missed School (Past Month due to Safety Concerns)	32.2% missed at least one day	²⁵
Symptoms of Anxiety (Recent)	66% (Trevor 2024); 73% (Trevor 2022)	¹⁴
Symptoms of Depression (Recent)	53% (Trevor 2024); 58% (Trevor 2022)	¹⁴
Seriously Considered Suicide (Past Year)	39% (Trevor 2024); 41% (LGBTQ+ YRBS 2023); 52.9% (Transgender YRBS 2023)	¹⁴
Attempted Suicide (Past Year)	12% (Trevor 2024); ~26% (Transgender/Questioning YRBS 2023)	¹⁴

Notes: SO=Sexual Orientation, GE=Gender Expression, G=Gender. Statistics are from the most recent available surveys cited (primarily GLSEN 2021, Trevor Project 2022/2024, CDC YRBS 2023). Specific rates can vary by subpopulation (e.g., race/ethnicity, gender identity).

C. Mental Health and Well-being: Documented Disparities

The hostile environments frequently encountered in schools contribute significantly to documented mental health disparities among LGBTQIA+ youth. Compared to their heterosexual and cisgender peers, these students face substantially elevated risks for a range of negative mental health outcomes.¹⁷

National surveys consistently reveal higher rates of anxiety and depression symptoms among LGBTQIA+ youth.⁷⁴ For example, The Trevor Project’s 2024 National Survey found that 66% of LGBTQ+ young people reported recent anxiety symptoms and 53% reported recent depression symptoms.¹⁴ These rates are often even higher for transgender and nonbinary youth, with the same survey showing 71% experiencing anxiety symptoms and 59% experiencing depression symptoms.¹⁴

Most alarming are the disparities related to suicidal ideation and attempts. LGBTQIA+ youth seriously consider and attempt suicide at rates far exceeding their peers.⁷⁴ The Trevor Project’s 2024 data indicated that 39% of LGBTQ+ young people seriously considered attempting suicide in the past year, including 46% of transgender and nonbinary youth.¹⁴ Twelve percent of LGBTQ+ youth overall, and 14% of transgender and nonbinary youth, attempted suicide in the past year.¹⁴ Data from the CDC’s 2023 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) corroborate these findings, showing 41% of LGBTQ+ students seriously considered suicide compared to 13% of their cisgender and heterosexual peers.³⁶ For transgender and questioning students specifically, the YRBS found over half considered suicide, and approximately 26% attempted it in the past year.⁶⁷

Beyond anxiety, depression, and suicidality, LGBTQIA+ youth also show increased risk for substance use, including illicit drugs and misuse of prescription opioids.³⁶ They are also more likely to experience violence victimization, including being forced to have sex, and face higher rates of housing instability.³⁶

Crucially, research indicates that these mental health disparities are not inherent characteristics of being LGBTQIA+. Instead, they are largely consequences of the chronic stress associated with societal stigma, discrimination, prejudice, victimization, and lack of acceptance encountered in various environments, including schools.³⁵ The constant navigation of hostile climates, fear of rejection, and experiences of bias take a significant toll on young people’s psychological well-being. This understanding shifts the focus from pathologizing LGBTQIA+ identities to addressing the harmful environments that create these risks, reinforcing the critical role schools play in mitigating harm through supportive and affirming practices.

Further complicating the mental health landscape are significant barriers to accessing care. A majority of LGBTQIA+ youth who desire mental health support are unable to obtain it.⁷⁴ The Trevor Project surveys consistently identify top barriers such as fear of discussing mental health concerns, concerns about needing parental/caregiver permission, fear of not being taken seriously, lack of affordability, and fear of being outed or having their identity misunderstood.¹⁴ These barriers, particularly those related to parental consent and confidentiality, highlight a potential avenue for schools to serve as vital points of access. Given the amount of time students spend in school ⁸¹, trained and trusted school mental health professionals (counselors, psychologists, social workers) ⁸² could potentially bridge the care gap, provided they are equipped with appropriate training and can navigate confidentiality ethically and legally, prioritizing student safety.

Finally, the broader socio-political climate significantly impacts LGBTQIA+ youth mental health. A vast majority (90% in 2024) report that recent politics and anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation have negatively impacted their well-being.⁷⁴ Hearing about proposed discriminatory laws, such as those restricting discussion of LGBTQIA+ topics in schools (“Don’t Say Gay” bills), directly worsens mental health for many young people.²⁸ This political hostility contributes to a climate of fear and uncertainty, with substantial numbers of LGBTQIA+ youth and their families considering moving to more affirming states.⁷⁴

D. School Climate Matters: The Impact on Academic Success and Overall Well-being

The overall climate of a school—defined as the quality and character of school life, encompassing safety, relationships, teaching, learning, and the physical environment ¹⁷—profoundly influences student outcomes. For LGBTQIA+ students, the nature of the school climate is particularly critical, acting as either a significant risk factor or a powerful protective buffer. A positive school climate is one that fosters resilience and supports the well-being of all students.¹⁷

Extensive research demonstrates a strong correlation between hostile school climates—characterized by high levels of victimization, discrimination, biased language, and lack of support—and negative outcomes for LGBTQIA+ students.¹⁷ Students enduring such environments are more likely to experience lower grade point averages (GPAs), miss school due to feeling unsafe, have lower educational aspirations (including plans for postsecondary education), report lower self-esteem, and suffer from poorer psychological well-being, including higher levels of depression and anxiety.¹⁷ Victimization based on SOGIE is directly linked to a lower sense of school belonging.²⁷

Conversely, supportive and affirming school climates yield significant benefits. When schools are perceived as safe, welcoming, and inclusive, LGBTQIA+ students demonstrate better academic performance, higher levels of school engagement and connectedness, improved mental health, reduced participation in risky behaviors, and higher self-esteem.⁷⁴ Crucially, affirming school environments are associated with significantly lower rates of attempting suicide among LGBTQIA+ youth.⁷⁴ School connectedness—feeling that adults and peers care about students as individuals and about their success—is a key indicator of a positive climate and serves as a powerful protective factor against a range of negative outcomes.³⁶

Research by GLSEN has consistently identified four key school-based supports that are strongly correlated with safer, more inclusive school climates and better outcomes for LGBTQIA+ students. These “Four Supports” are: (1) supportive educators and school staff, (2) LGBTQIA+-inclusive curriculum, (3) comprehensive non-discrimination and anti-bullying policies that enumerate SOGIE, and (4) the presence of student-led clubs like Gender-Sexuality Alliances (GSAs).⁴

The consistent link between these specific, actionable supports and positive school climates demonstrates that climate is not merely a passive condition influenced solely by external societal factors. Rather, it is actively shaped and cultivated by the deliberate policies, practices, and resources that schools choose to implement (or neglect).³ This places the power and responsibility for creating positive climates firmly within the purview of school leaders and educators. Furthermore, the benefits of creating an LGBTQIA+-inclusive climate extend to the entire student body. Research indicates that the presence of supports like GSAs and inclusive practices fosters greater respect, reduces overall bullying, and contributes to a safer, more positive learning environment for all students, not just those who identify as LGBTQIA+.² This highlights that investing in LGBTQIA+ inclusion is an investment in a healthier, more equitable school ecosystem for everyone.

II. Building Inclusive Foundations: Essential Policies and Practices

Creating school environments where LGBTQIA+ students feel safe, respected, and fully included requires a deliberate and comprehensive approach rooted in strong policies and consistently applied practices. These foundational elements provide the necessary structure and guidance for fostering an affirming school climate.

A. Establishing Protections: Comprehensive Non-Discrimination and Anti-Bullying Policies

Formal policies serve as the bedrock for protecting LGBTQIA+ students. They are not merely symbolic statements but critical tools for establishing expectations, guiding staff actions, and ensuring accountability.⁹⁴ The absence of clear, protective policies often correlates with more hostile school climates.²³

A crucial element of effective policies is enumeration – the explicit inclusion of “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” and “gender expression” (along with other characteristics like race, disability, religion, etc.) as protected categories within non-discrimination and anti-bullying/harassment rules.³ Research indicates that generic policies prohibiting bullying or discrimination without naming specific groups are significantly less effective in protecting vulnerable populations like LGBTQIA+ students.³¹ Enumeration provides essential clarity for students and families regarding their rights and gives teachers and administrators unambiguous authority and guidance to intervene when identity-based harassment occurs.³¹ It signals a clear institutional commitment to protecting these specific student groups.⁷

These policies should have a broad scope, applying to all members of the school community (students, staff, volunteers) and covering conduct that occurs in school buildings, on school grounds, during school-sponsored events and transportation, at bus stops, and significantly, through electronic communication (cyberbullying) that impacts the school environment.⁷

Non-discrimination policies should explicitly prohibit differential treatment or denial of opportunities based on actual or perceived SOGIE and sex characteristics (including intersex traits).⁷ This includes addressing biased enforcement of general school rules, such as those regarding public displays of affection (PDA) or disciplinary measures, ensuring LGBTQIA+ students are not unfairly targeted.¹⁴

Anti-bullying and harassment policies must define and prohibit various forms of mistreatment—verbal, physical, sexual, and cyber—based on the enumerated characteristics.⁷ These policies need to incorporate clear procedures for reporting incidents, protocols for prompt and impartial investigations, defined consequences for violations (with a preference for restorative rather than purely punitive approaches ⁹⁴), and explicit prohibitions against retaliation for reporting or participating in an investigation.⁷

The positive impact of such comprehensive, enumerated policies is well-documented. Schools with these policies in place report lower levels of anti-LGBTQIA+ victimization, increased intervention by staff when witnessing biased remarks or behaviors, a greater sense of safety among students, and reduced absenteeism.³

However, the mere existence of a policy is insufficient.²³ Effective implementation and consistent enforcement are paramount.³ Numerous challenges can hinder policy fidelity, including inadequate staff training, insufficient resources, fear of community or parental backlash, lack of support from leadership, and conflicting state or local directives.³⁹ Bridging this gap between policy adoption and effective practice requires ongoing commitment, training, administrative support, and community engagement.

B. Affirming Identity: Names, Pronouns, and Student Records

Respecting and affirming a student’s gender identity is a critical component of creating a supportive school environment, particularly for transgender and nonbinary students. This involves specific practices related to names, pronouns, and student records.

Students possess the right to be addressed by the name and pronouns (e.g., she/her, he/him, they/them, ze/hir) that align with their gender identity.⁷ This affirmation should be standard practice and, ideally, should not be contingent upon legal name changes, medical documentation, or parental consent, although state laws may create complexities in the latter area.⁷ Research indicates that consistent use of affirmed names and pronouns by people in a young person’s life is significantly associated with better mental health outcomes, including lower rates of depression and suicidal ideation.⁷⁴ Therefore, using correct names and pronouns is not merely a matter of courtesy but a fundamental aspect of student safety and well-being.⁷⁴ Deliberately or repeatedly misgendering (using incorrect pronouns) or deadnaming (using a former name) a student constitutes a form of harassment and discrimination.⁸

School record-keeping systems must be adapted to support student affirmation. Schools should have procedures allowing students to update their affirmed name, pronouns, and gender marker in the school’s database.⁷ While official transcripts may require a legal name, all other school documents and contexts—including ID cards, class rosters, library records, yearbooks, awards, and diplomas—should use the student’s affirmed name and pronouns.⁷ Systems should be designed to ensure that while the legal name is securely stored for necessary administrative purposes, the affirmed name and pronouns are what appear in daily use by teachers and staff, protecting student privacy and preventing accidental outing.⁷

Confidentiality is paramount. School staff have an ethical and often legal obligation to protect a student’s privacy regarding their sexual orientation, gender identity, or transgender status.⁸ Information about a student’s gender identity should not be disclosed to others, including parents/guardians or other staff members, without the student’s explicit permission, unless there is a specific legal requirement or a concern for imminent harm.⁹ Staff should proactively and privately ask students how they wish to be identified in communications with home, especially if the student is not out to their family.⁷ The student’s safety and well-being must always be the primary consideration.¹¹² Policies that mandate forced outing of students to their parents are detrimental and potentially dangerous, as not all families are supportive, and disclosure can lead to rejection or abuse.⁷² This area represents a significant point of conflict, where recent legislative efforts promoting “parental rights” clash directly with established ethical guidelines prioritizing student safety and confidentiality.⁹ Navigating this tension requires careful legal counsel, adherence to ethical principles, and an unwavering focus on the student’s safety.

C. Ensuring Equitable Access: Facilities and Dress Codes

Equitable access to school facilities and the freedom to express one’s gender through appearance are essential for the inclusion and safety of LGBTQIA+ students, particularly those who are transgender or nonbinary.

Regarding facilities access, established best practices and evolving legal interpretations (primarily under Title IX, though currently contested) affirm that students should have access to restrooms, locker rooms, and changing facilities that correspond to their gender identity.⁷ While schools can maintain sex-separated facilities, they must grant access based on a student’s affirmed gender identity.⁷ For nonbinary students, the choice of facility should be based on where they feel safest and most comfortable.⁷ Forcing a transgender or nonbinary student to use facilities that do not align with their identity, or requiring them to use separate, segregated facilities (like a nurse’s office restroom), is discriminatory, stigmatizing, and potentially outs the student.⁷ Schools should provide safe and non-stigmatizing alternatives, such as single-user, all-gender restrooms or private changing areas (e.g., with privacy curtains or separate schedules), but only upon the request of any student seeking additional privacy, regardless of their reason.⁷ Mandating these alternatives specifically for transgender or nonbinary students is inappropriate.⁷ The denial of access to appropriate facilities is not merely an inconvenience; it poses significant health and safety risks. Many transgender and nonbinary students avoid using school restrooms altogether due to fear of harassment or discomfort, which can lead to physical health problems and significant anxiety.¹² Ensuring affirming access is thus a prerequisite for students’ basic well-being and participation in the school day.

Dress codes must also be approached with equity and inclusivity. Policies should be gender-neutral, avoiding rules that prescribe different attire for different genders or reinforce gender stereotypes.⁷ All students, including transgender and nonbinary students, have the right to dress in a manner consistent with their gender identity and expression, provided their attire complies with the general, gender-neutral rules applicable to all students (e.g., rules regarding length, logos, or safety).⁷ Enforcement of dress codes must be equitable and should not disproportionately target LGBTQIA+ students or students whose expression challenges traditional gender norms.⁷

D. Accountability and Recourse: Complaint Procedures and Policy Enforcement

Effective policies require robust mechanisms for enforcement and accountability. Schools and districts must establish clear, accessible, and reliable procedures for students and families to report incidents of discrimination, harassment, or bullying.⁷

These procedures should be well-publicized, appearing annually in student handbooks and on school websites, and should include contact information for the designated Title IX Coordinator.⁷ Reporting should be possible through multiple avenues (mail, email, phone, in-person) and should allow for anonymity if requested by the complainant.⁷

Upon receiving a complaint, schools are obligated to conduct a prompt, thorough, and impartial investigation.⁷ Critically, supportive measures must be offered to the complainant promptly, regardless of whether they choose to file a formal complaint.⁷ These measures aim to restore or preserve equal access to education without unreasonably burdening the complainant and can include counseling referrals, academic accommodations (like deadline extensions), schedule changes, safety escorts, or no-contact orders.⁷ The response to substantiated complaints should prioritize education and prevention, utilizing restorative justice approaches where appropriate, rather than relying solely on punitive measures.⁷

Policies must explicitly prohibit retaliation against anyone involved in the complaint process—complainants, witnesses, or participants in an investigation.⁷ School administrators bear the responsibility for ensuring policies are consistently enforced.⁷ To monitor effectiveness and identify systemic issues, schools should maintain confidential records of complaints, including demographic data and resolutions, and ideally report aggregated, anonymized data to the school board and public.⁷ A lack of consistent enforcement significantly undermines the protective intent of any policy.²³

Given the previously discussed finding that a majority of students do not report victimization due to a belief that nothing will be done ²⁷, the perceived fairness and responsiveness of the complaint process itself is crucial. Implementing procedures that are transparent, timely, communicative, and prioritize the student’s immediate safety and support needs can help address this trust deficit. Demonstrating procedural justice—that the system handles complaints seriously and supportively—is key to encouraging reporting and making policies meaningful in practice.

Students and families should also be aware of external avenues for recourse. Complaints alleging violations of Title IX can be filed directly with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR).⁴⁶ State education agencies or human rights commissions may also handle complaints, depending on state law.⁴⁶ Additionally, legal advocacy organizations such as the ACLU and Lambda Legal can provide information and potential representation.³²

Table 3: Key Components of Comprehensive School Policies for LGBTQIA+ Inclusion

Policy Area	Essential Components	Supporting Sources
Non-Discrimination	– Explicitly enumerates sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, sex characteristics. <br> – Prohibits discrimination in all school programs, activities, and practices. <br> – Applies to students, staff, families, volunteers. <br> – Addresses biased application of general rules (e.g., discipline, PDA).	⁷
Anti-Bullying/ Harassment	– Explicitly enumerates SOGIE. <br> – Defines and prohibits verbal, physical, sexual, and cyberbullying/harassment based on SOGIE. <br> – Includes clear reporting procedures (multiple methods, anonymity option). <br> – Mandates prompt, impartial investigation. <br> – Outlines consequences (restorative focus encouraged). <br> – Prohibits retaliation. <br> – Covers on-campus, off-campus (if impacting school), and electronic conduct.	⁷
Name/Pronoun Usage & Student Records	– Requires staff use of student’s affirmed name and pronouns. <br> – Allows students to update affirmed name/pronouns/gender marker in school systems. <br> – Uses affirmed name/pronouns on all non-legal documents (IDs, rosters, diplomas). <br> – Protects confidentiality of legal name/gender assigned at birth/transgender status. <br> – Requires student consent for disclosure to parents/others (prioritizing student safety).	⁷
Facilities Access	– Guarantees access to restrooms/locker rooms consistent with gender identity. <br> – Allows nonbinary students to determine safest/most comfortable option. <br> – Prohibits mandatory use of non-affirming or segregated facilities. <br> – Provides safe, non-stigmatizing alternatives (e.g., single-user restroom) upon request for any student seeking privacy.	⁷
Dress Codes	– Must be gender-neutral, avoiding gender stereotypes. <br> – Allows students to dress consistent with their gender identity/expression. <br> – Requires equitable enforcement for all students.	⁷
Complaint Procedures	– Clearly defined, accessible process for reporting discrimination/harassment. <br> – Includes Title IX Coordinator contact information. <br> – Allows multiple reporting methods (including anonymous). <br> – Requires prompt investigation and response. <br> – Mandates offering supportive measures to complainants. <br> – Prohibits retaliation. <br> – Requires record-keeping and monitoring.	⁷

III. Fostering Inclusion Through Education

Beyond establishing protective policies, schools play a vital role in actively fostering inclusion through educational practices. This involves both the formal curriculum taught in classrooms and the informal curriculum conveyed through the actions and attitudes of school personnel. Equipping educators with the knowledge, skills, and disposition to create affirming learning environments is paramount.

A. Windows and Mirrors: Crafting LGBTQIA+-Inclusive Curriculum (History, Literature, Health, etc.)

Curriculum serves a dual function in shaping student understanding and identity. It acts as a “mirror” when it reflects students’ own lives, experiences, and identities back to them, providing validation and affirmation. Simultaneously, it serves as a “window” when it offers insights into the diverse experiences and perspectives of others, fostering empathy, understanding, and respect for difference.¹⁸ An inclusive curriculum intentionally incorporates diverse mirrors and windows for all students, including those who are LGBTQIA+.

The benefits of implementing LGBTQIA+-inclusive curriculum are substantial and well-documented. Research consistently shows that when students learn about LGBTQIA+ people, history, and events in a positive and affirming way, school climates improve.⁴ Specifically, LGBTQIA+ students in schools with inclusive curriculum report hearing homophobic and transphobic remarks less frequently, feel safer at school, miss fewer days of school due to safety concerns, experience lower levels of victimization, are more likely to report that their classmates are accepting of LGBTQIA+ people, feel more connected to their school community, and demonstrate better academic outcomes, including higher GPAs and educational aspirations.⁴ Inclusive curriculum also benefits all students by promoting critical thinking about diversity, challenging stereotypes, and preparing them to collaborate respectfully in a multicultural world.¹³¹

Despite these benefits, the reality is that most LGBTQIA+ students in the U.S. do not have access to an inclusive curriculum.⁵⁹ This exclusion is sometimes codified in state laws, known as “No Promo Homo” laws, which restrict or prohibit positive discussions of LGBTQIA+ topics or individuals in schools.²³ Conversely, a growing number of states (like Illinois and California) have begun mandating the inclusion of LGBTQIA+ history and contributions in their curriculum standards.⁹⁰

Effective integration requires moving beyond isolated lessons or “fragmentation”.¹³¹ LGBTQIA+ themes, figures, and perspectives should be woven naturally into the existing curriculum across various subjects and grade levels. Examples include:

Elementary Schools: Discussing diverse family structures (including two-mom or two-dad families, families with transgender parents) in social studies and literature ¹³¹; using inclusive language in math word problems ¹³¹; reading age-appropriate books featuring LGBTQIA+ characters or exploring gender diversity ¹⁴³; using lessons like GLSEN’s Ready, Set, Respect! or Identity Flowers to explore identity and challenge gender stereotypes.¹³¹
Middle and High Schools: Incorporating LGBTQIA+ figures and events into history lessons (e.g., the Stonewall Uprising, contributions of Harvey Milk, Bayard Rustin, Alan Turing, Sally Ride, Marsha P. Johnson) ⁷⁶; analyzing literature with LGBTQIA+ characters or themes ¹³¹; teaching science concepts (like genetics or biology) in ways that acknowledge the spectrum of sex characteristics (including intersex variations) and avoid reinforcing rigid gender binaries ¹³¹; providing comprehensive and SOGIE-inclusive sexual health education ⁶; using data from surveys like the NSCS for statistics lessons ¹³¹; discussing the historical erasure of LGBTQIA+ people and analyzing media representation.¹³¹

Numerous organizations provide valuable resources for developing and implementing inclusive curriculum, including lesson plans, booklists, historical timelines, and professional development materials. Key providers include GLSEN, Learning for Justice, HRC Welcoming Schools, PFLAG, The Trevor Project, and others specializing in specific intersections like Keshet (Jewish LGBTQ+ resources) or Our Family Coalition.⁴

However, educators often face significant challenges in implementing inclusive curriculum, including personal discomfort, lack of adequate training or resources, insufficient time, fear of administrative or parental backlash, and navigating restrictive state or local policies.³⁹ Overcoming these barriers requires administrative support, targeted professional development, and clear communication strategies.

The consistent link between inclusive curriculum and improved school climate underscores its function as more than just academic content delivery; it is an active tool for fostering empathy, reducing prejudice, and creating a safer, more connected school community for all students.⁴ Furthermore, true inclusivity demands attention to intersectionality. Curriculum should reflect the diversity within the LGBTQIA+ community, ensuring that the experiences and contributions of LGBTQIA+ people of color, individuals with disabilities, and those from various socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds are represented and valued.²⁴ Centering narratives that are predominantly white, cisgender, and able-bodied fails to provide accurate mirrors and windows for many students and can perpetuate other forms of marginalization.

B. The Human Element: The Critical Role of School Personnel

While policies and curriculum provide essential frameworks, the day-to-day school experience for LGBTQIA+ students is profoundly shaped by the actions and attitudes of the adults they interact with—teachers, counselors, administrators, librarians, nurses, coaches, bus drivers, and support staff. Supportive school personnel are arguably one of the most critical factors in creating a safe and affirming environment.³

Research consistently highlights the positive impact of having supportive adults in school. The presence of even one visibly supportive educator can significantly improve an LGBTQIA+ student’s experience.⁵¹ Students who can identify supportive staff members report feeling safer, experience less identity-based victimization, have higher GPAs, miss school less often due to safety concerns, feel a greater sense of school belonging, and exhibit better mental health outcomes compared to those without such support.³ Feeling cared for by teachers is directly associated with lower odds of attempting suicide.²⁸ This underscores the immense potential impact that every single adult in a school building can have on the lives of vulnerable students. Individual actions, while part of a needed systemic approach, matter deeply.

Effective support requires more than passive tolerance; it necessitates active allyship.¹⁶² Key actions of supportive personnel include:

Intervening: Consistently challenging and stopping anti-LGBTQIA+ remarks, slurs, jokes, and bullying behaviors, whether from students or other staff.³
Affirming Identity: Using students’ affirmed names and pronouns correctly and consistently.⁷
Visibility: Displaying visible symbols of support, such as Safe Space stickers, posters, or rainbow flags, signaling a welcoming environment.⁶
Inclusion: Integrating positive representations of LGBTQIA+ people and topics into curriculum and classroom discussions.⁸⁵
Supporting Student Groups: Advising or actively supporting GSAs or similar student clubs.⁶
Advocacy: Advocating for inclusive school policies, practices, and resources.⁶
Being a Resource: Serving as a trusted adult whom students can approach for support, guidance, or connection to resources.³

School counselors and psychologists play a particularly specialized role, guided by professional ethical standards (like those from ASCA and NASP) that mandate promoting equal opportunity, ensuring safety, maintaining student confidentiality (while navigating legal requirements and parental rights), advocating for systemic change, providing affirming counseling, and connecting students and families with appropriate resources.⁵¹ These ethical codes explicitly state that attempting to change a student’s sexual orientation or gender identity is harmful and unethical.⁵¹

School administrators are also pivotal. Their leadership sets the tone for the entire school, influences policy implementation, determines resource allocation, empowers (or hinders) staff efforts, and is crucial in navigating controversies or community concerns.⁴ Supportive and visible administrative leadership is a key predictor of successful LGBTQIA+ inclusion initiatives.⁹⁷

Despite the clear importance of supportive personnel, significant challenges exist. Many educators report feeling unprepared, lacking confidence, or lacking sufficient training to effectively support LGBTQIA+ students or address related issues like bullying and identity affirmation.³ Fear of backlash from parents, community members, or even administrators can inhibit educators from taking supportive actions or implementing inclusive practices.³ Personal biases or discomfort with LGBTQIA+ topics can also be barriers.³ Furthermore, research indicates that school staff sometimes fail to intervene in anti-LGBTQIA+ harassment, or worse, participate in it themselves.³ These factors highlight the critical need for comprehensive and ongoing professional development.

C. Equipping Educators: Professional Development and Training Needs

To effectively fulfill their roles in supporting LGBTQIA+ students, school personnel require targeted and comprehensive professional development (PD). The prevalent feeling of unpreparedness among educators ³ and the documented lack of intervention in biased incidents underscore a critical gap that high-quality training can address. Lack of PD is frequently cited as a major barrier to implementing inclusive practices.¹⁰⁶

Effective PD programs move beyond basic awareness to build concrete skills and competencies.⁶ Key content areas should include ³:

Foundational Knowledge: Accurate LGBTQIA+ terminology, understanding the distinctions between sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression (SOGIE), and basics of identity development.
Understanding Student Experiences: Awareness of the specific challenges LGBTQIA+ youth face (bullying, discrimination, mental health risks, family rejection) and the impact of hostile school climates, including intersectional experiences (e.g., for youth of color, youth with disabilities).
Intervention Skills: Practical strategies for effectively and consistently intervening in anti-LGBTQIA+ language, bullying, and harassment.
Creating Inclusive Environments: Techniques for fostering affirming classroom cultures, using inclusive language (including names and pronouns), challenging gender stereotypes, and incorporating LGBTQIA+ visibility.
Supporting Transgender and Nonbinary Students: Specific guidance on affirming names/pronouns, navigating facilities access, understanding confidentiality, and supporting gender transition processes.
Curriculum Integration: Methods for incorporating LGBTQIA+ topics, history, and figures into various subjects in age-appropriate ways.
Policy and Legal Literacy: Understanding relevant school policies, district guidelines, state laws, and federal protections (like Title IX).
Resource Navigation: Awareness of school-based and community resources for LGBTQIA+ youth and their families.
Allyship Development: Exploring the meaning of allyship and developing skills for advocacy.

Crucially, effective training should also incorporate opportunities for educators to engage in self-reflection.⁷⁶ This involves examining personal biases, assumptions about gender and sexuality, and how their own identities and experiences might influence their interactions with students. Recognizing and addressing internal biases is a necessary step toward becoming a truly effective and equitable ally. Training should also be differentiated to address the specific roles and responsibilities of various staff members (e.g., teachers, counselors, administrators, librarians).¹⁷⁶

Numerous organizations, including GLSEN, The Trevor Project, HRC Welcoming Schools, PFLAG, ASCA, and NASP, offer specialized PD programs and resources for educators and school staff.⁶ Evaluations of such programs generally show positive results, indicating increases in educators’ knowledge, empathy, confidence in intervening, awareness of harmful practices, access to resources, and likelihood of engaging in supportive actions.³ Some evidence suggests that sustained PD over time yields greater benefits than one-off sessions.¹⁶¹ The success of PD initiatives often hinges on administrative support, including mandating or strongly encouraging participation and allocating necessary time and resources.¹⁶¹

IV. Empowering Students: Support Networks and Advocacy

Beyond policies and educator actions, empowering students themselves through peer support networks and opportunities for advocacy is a vital component of creating inclusive schools. Gender-Sexuality Alliances (GSAs) are the most prominent example of such student-led initiatives.

A. Gender-Sexuality Alliances (GSAs): Function, Impact, and Research Evidence

GSAs, historically known as Gay-Straight Alliances, are student-initiated and student-led school clubs designed to provide a safe and supportive environment for LGBTQIA+ students and their allies.³ These clubs serve multiple functions, often evolving based on student needs and school context. They can operate primarily as social groups, fostering connections and community; support groups, offering a confidential space to discuss challenges and feelings; or activist groups, working to educate the school community and advocate for policy changes and improved school climate.¹⁹² Many GSAs combine elements of all three functions.¹⁹³

The positive impact of GSAs is strongly supported by research. The presence of a GSA in a school is consistently linked to a more positive school climate overall.⁴⁰ LGBTQIA+ students in schools with GSAs report hearing fewer homophobic and transphobic remarks, experiencing less victimization based on SOGIE, feeling safer at school, and perceiving their peers as more accepting.²¹ Participation in GSAs is associated with a greater sense of school belonging.⁴⁰ Furthermore, GSAs contribute to better mental health outcomes, including lower levels of depression and suicidality, and higher self-esteem.⁴⁰ Academically, students in schools with GSAs tend to miss fewer days of school and may have higher GPAs and college aspirations.²¹

Importantly, the positive influence of GSAs often extends beyond their active members. The mere presence of a GSA can signal institutional support and contribute to a safer climate for all students, including non-LGBTQIA+ peers.⁹³ This suggests GSAs can act as catalysts, shifting school culture towards greater acceptance and respect. They function as more than just extracurricular clubs; they are vital hubs for social connection, emotional support, identity exploration, peer education, and student-led advocacy, addressing a wide range of needs within the school environment.³

Despite their proven benefits, GSAs are not universally available. GLSEN data indicated a decline in GSA availability between 2019 and 2021 ²⁵, and they are less common in rural schools.⁷⁰ However, students in public secondary schools generally have a legal right to form GSAs under the federal Equal Access Act (EAA).⁸ This act requires schools receiving federal funds that allow any non-curricular student group (e.g., chess club, service club) to meet on campus must provide equal access to all other non-curricular groups, regardless of the content of their speech. This means schools cannot legally ban GSAs based on their focus on LGBTQIA+ issues, nor can they impose stricter rules, require name changes (e.g., to “Diversity Club”), or deny access to school resources (like bulletin boards or announcements) afforded to other clubs.¹⁰¹

B. Cultivating Effective GSAs: Best Practices for Establishment and Sustainability

Launching and maintaining a successful GSA involves intentional planning and effort from both students and adult advisors. Best practices identified through research and student leader experiences include ⁸⁵:

Establishment: Follow the school’s standard procedures for forming any student club. Identify a supportive faculty or staff member willing to serve as an advisor. Recruit interested students through various channels (club fairs, posters, announcements, word-of-mouth, teacher referrals). Inform the school administration early to gain support, providing information about student rights under the EAA if necessary. Choose a meeting space that feels safe and accessible.
Advisor Role: The advisor’s role is crucial but requires balance. They should provide guidance, support, resources, help navigate school bureaucracy, ensure safety, and advocate for the club, but ultimately empower students to lead and make decisions.⁹³ An overly controlling or entirely absent advisor can hinder the GSA’s effectiveness. Factors like the advisor’s experience level, time commitment, and training can impact the GSA’s success, particularly regarding advocacy efforts.²⁰³
Structure and Meetings: Clearly define the GSA’s mission and goals (social, support, activist, or blend). Establish a leadership structure (e.g., officers, shared leadership). Plan meetings with clear agendas. Crucially, co-create and consistently uphold community agreements or ground rules to ensure a safe, respectful, and confidential environment.¹⁹⁷ Use inclusive practices like regular pronoun check-ins.¹⁹⁷ Facilitate active participation from all members and manage decision-making processes effectively. Keep records (minutes) to ensure continuity and communication.²⁰⁷
Recruitment and Retention: Utilize multiple strategies like club fairs, flyers, announcements, social media, and personal invitations.⁹³ Offering food can increase attendance.²⁰⁷ Actively counter negative stereotypes or rumors about the GSA and address fears related to joining due to potential harassment.⁹³
Activities: Plan a diverse range of activities that cater to the GSA’s defined purpose and member interests. Examples include social events (movie nights, game days, potlucks), support discussions (check-ins, coming out stories, mental health resources), educational activities (guest speakers, film/book discussions, learning about LGBTQIA+ history or rights), and advocacy campaigns (Day of Silence, Ally Week, anti-bullying initiatives, lobbying for policy changes like gender-neutral bathrooms).¹⁹²
Fundraising: If needed for activities or resources, understand school fundraising policies, set clear goals, choose appropriate strategies (soliciting donations, selling items, hosting events), and always thank supporters.¹⁹⁶
Sustainability: Intentional structure is key for long-term success. This includes planning for leadership transitions (identifying and training new leaders before current ones graduate), maintaining good records of activities and decisions, establishing reliable communication channels, and building strong relationships with the advisor, school administration, and other student groups.⁹³

Organizations like GLSEN and the GSA Network offer extensive resources, guides, and support for students and advisors involved in GSAs.⁹³

C. Intersectionality in Action: Supporting LGBTQIA+ Students of Color within GSAs

To be truly effective and equitable, GSAs must intentionally address the intersecting identities of their members, particularly LGBTQIA+ students of color, who navigate both racism and anti-LGBTQIA+ bias.²⁴ Historically, some GSAs have been critiqued for centering white experiences or failing to adequately address issues of race.⁶² Creating genuinely inclusive GSA spaces requires moving beyond a singular focus on sexual orientation and gender identity to actively incorporate an understanding of how multiple systems of oppression interact.⁶²

Strategies for fostering intersectional inclusion within GSAs include:

Explicit Anti-Racism: Establish and enforce clear club norms that explicitly condemn racism, anti-Blackness, and other forms of bigotry alongside homophobia and transphobia.¹⁹⁷
Centering Marginalized Experiences: Intentionally design programming, discussions, and advocacy efforts that prioritize and reflect the unique experiences and needs of LGBTQIA+ students of color.⁵⁵ This requires active listening and ensuring these students’ voices shape the GSA’s agenda, without burdening them with all the educational labor.²²⁴
Intersectionality Discussions: Facilitate conversations about how different identities (race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, class, ability, immigration status, etc.) intersect and how systems of oppression (racism, heterosexism, cisgenderism, classism, ableism, xenophobia) are interconnected.²⁰⁴ Exploring commonalities across different marginalized groups can build understanding and coalitions.²⁰⁴
“Brave Space” Approach: Recognize that discussions about race, privilege, and intersecting oppressions can be challenging and uncomfortable. Consider adopting “brave space” norms that encourage respectful participation and learning through discomfort, rather than solely focusing on a “safe space” that might inadvertently silence difficult but necessary conversations.²⁰⁴
Collaboration: Build partnerships with ethnic and cultural student clubs within the school to co-host events, share resources, and engage in joint advocacy efforts.⁵⁵ Encourage GSA members to also participate in these other identity-based groups.⁵⁵
Diverse Representation: Ensure that GSA leadership, visual materials, and educational content reflect the racial and ethnic diversity of the student body and the broader LGBTQIA+ community.⁵⁵ Intentionally include the histories and contributions of LGBTQIA+ people of color.⁵⁵
Targeted Support: Be aware of and share resources that specifically address the needs of LGBTQIA+ youth of color.²⁴

By embracing an intersectional framework and actively working against all forms of oppression, GSAs can become more powerful and affirming spaces for all their members.

V. Legal Rights and Ethical Responsibilities

Schools operate within a complex web of legal requirements and ethical obligations when supporting LGBTQIA+ students. Understanding these frameworks is essential for administrators, educators, students, and families to ensure rights are protected and responsibilities are met.

A. The Legal Bedrock: Title IX, Constitutional Guarantees, and the Equal Access Act

Several key federal laws and constitutional principles form the foundation of legal protections for LGBTQIA+ students in public schools:

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972: This federal law prohibits discrimination “on the basis of sex” in any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance, which includes nearly all public K-12 schools and many postsecondary institutions.⁷ For years, federal courts and the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) have interpreted Title IX’s prohibition of sex discrimination to encompass discrimination based on sex stereotypes, sexual orientation, and gender identity.⁷ This interpretation covers issues like harassment, discriminatory discipline, access to facilities consistent with gender identity, and the use of affirmed names and pronouns.⁷ However, this interpretation, particularly regarding gender identity, is currently facing significant legal and political challenges (discussed below).
U.S. Constitution – Equal Protection Clause (14th Amendment): This clause requires that states guarantee “equal protection of the laws” to all persons within their jurisdiction. In the school context, this means public schools cannot intentionally discriminate against LGBTQIA+ students or treat anti-LGBTQIA+ harassment less seriously than other forms of harassment based on prejudice or disapproval.⁴⁶
U.S. Constitution – First Amendment: This amendment protects students’ rights to freedom of speech and association in public schools. This includes the right to express their identity, speak about LGBTQIA+ issues, wear clothing or symbols expressing support (e.g., rainbow pins, t-shirts), distribute informational materials, and bring a same-sex date to school events like prom, provided the expression does not substantially disrupt the educational environment or infringe on the rights of others (e.g., constitute harassment).⁸ The First Amendment also protects students’ right to associate, which underpins the right to form GSAs.
Equal Access Act (EAA): This federal law applies to public secondary schools receiving federal funds that permit one or more “noncurriculum related student groups” to meet on campus. If such a “limited open forum” exists, the school cannot deny equal access or fair treatment to other student groups based on the religious, political, philosophical, or other content of their speech.⁸ This is the primary legal basis guaranteeing the right of students to form GSAs and receive the same privileges (meeting space, access to communication channels) as other non-curricular clubs.¹⁹⁵
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA): This federal law protects the privacy of student education records. While not specific to LGBTQIA+ status, its principles are relevant when handling sensitive information related to a student’s SOGIE, particularly regarding disclosure to third parties, including parents.²⁰

These federal laws and constitutional guarantees establish a baseline of protection. Many states and local school districts have enacted their own non-discrimination and anti-bullying laws or policies that explicitly include sexual orientation and gender identity, sometimes offering broader protections than federal law.³¹ This creates multiple layers of potential legal protection for LGBTQIA+ students, offering various avenues for seeking recourse if their rights are violated.⁸ Even in states lacking explicit protections or enacting hostile laws, federal law and the Constitution still apply.⁴⁶

B. Evolving Interpretations: Bostock v. Clayton County and Its Significance for Schools

A pivotal development in LGBTQIA+ rights occurred with the 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. Clayton County.⁴⁶ In this case, the Court ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination “because of… sex,” necessarily protects employees from discrimination based on their sexual orientation or gender identity. The Court’s reasoning, articulated by Justice Gorsuch, was that it is impossible to discriminate against a person for being gay or transgender without inherently considering their sex.²²⁵ For example, if an employer fires a male employee for being attracted to men, but would not fire a female employee for being attracted to men, the employer is making a decision based on the employee’s sex. Similarly, firing a transgender person for identifying with a gender different from their sex assigned at birth involves considering sex.²²⁵

Although Bostock directly addressed Title VII (employment), its logic—that discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity is inextricably linked to sex—had significant implications for other federal laws prohibiting sex discrimination, including Title IX in education.⁴⁶ Following this decision, the Biden administration’s Department of Education issued guidance in 2021 and finalized new Title IX regulations in April 2024, explicitly stating that Title IX’s prohibition on sex discrimination includes discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex characteristics.¹²⁵ This interpretation aimed to solidify federal protections for LGBTQIA+ students regarding harassment, access to facilities, pronoun usage, and participation in school activities consistent with their gender identity.¹²⁶

However, the application of Bostock‘s reasoning to Title IX remains highly contested.²²⁷ Opponents, including numerous state attorneys general who filed lawsuits, argue that Bostock was narrowly tailored to Title VII and that Title IX’s language (“on the basis of sex”) and historical context pertain only to biological sex differences between males and females.²²⁹ They argue the DOE exceeded its authority in redefining “sex” to include gender identity.²²⁹

As of early 2025, these legal challenges have led to significant shifts. In January 2025, a federal district court in Kentucky vacated the 2024 Title IX regulations nationwide, ruling that the DOE had indeed exceeded its authority and that Bostock did not mandate the expansion of Title IX to include gender identity.²²⁷ This ruling effectively reverts Title IX enforcement standards back to the 2020 regulations implemented under the previous administration, which do not explicitly include protections based on gender identity or sexual orientation in the same manner.²²⁷ This decision followed earlier injunctions that had already blocked the 2024 rule in 26 states.²³⁸ Furthermore, a new presidential administration issued an executive order in January 2025 defining “sex” strictly as biological sex assigned at birth and explicitly stating that Bostock should not apply to Title IX, directing agencies to rescind conflicting guidance.⁷²

This rapid back-and-forth leaves the precise scope of federal Title IX protections for LGBTQIA+ students in a state of flux and uncertainty. While the 2020 regulations are currently operative nationwide ²²⁷, the underlying legal questions regarding Bostock‘s applicability and the definition of “sex” under Title IX are likely subject to further litigation, potential appeals, and future administrative actions.²²⁷ Schools must navigate this complex and changing landscape, often relying on existing state laws, constitutional principles, and legal counsel to guide their policies and practices regarding LGBTQIA+ students.

C. State Law Variations: A Patchwork of Protections

Federal laws provide a baseline, but state laws regarding the protection of LGBTQIA+ students vary significantly, creating a patchwork of rights across the country.²³

Some states have enacted comprehensive laws that explicitly prohibit discrimination and/or bullying in schools based on both sexual orientation and gender identity.³¹ These laws often provide clearer guidance and stronger enforcement mechanisms at the state level than relying solely on federal interpretations. As of recent tracking, around 20 states plus D.C. had anti-bullying laws enumerating both characteristics, and a similar number had explicit non-discrimination laws covering both in educational settings.³¹

Other states may have laws that enumerate only sexual orientation, or rely on interpretations of existing sex discrimination bans (potentially influenced by Bostock-like reasoning at the state level) to cover LGBTQIA+ students.⁹⁹ A significant number of states, however, lack explicit statewide laws protecting students from discrimination or bullying based on SOGIE.⁹⁹

Conversely, some states have enacted laws actively hostile to LGBTQIA+ students.²³ These include:

“Don’t Say Gay/Trans” Laws: Restricting or prohibiting classroom instruction or discussion about sexual orientation or gender identity, particularly in early grades.²³
Forced Outing Laws: Requiring school staff to notify parents if a student identifies as transgender or questions their gender.⁷²
Bathroom/Facility Bans: Prohibiting transgender students from using facilities consistent with their gender identity.⁷²
Sports Bans: Barring transgender students from participating in school sports teams aligned with their gender identity.⁷²
Curriculum Restrictions/Book Bans: Mandating removal of LGBTQIA+-themed books or prohibiting inclusive curriculum.¹¹⁴

These conflicting state laws create significant challenges for schools trying to comply with both state mandates and federal interpretations (like those under Title IX, even if currently contested) or constitutional requirements. Resources like the GLSEN Navigator ⁸ and the Movement Advancement Project (MAP) ⁶ track these state-level variations.

D. Ethical Imperatives: Responsibilities of Educators and Mental Health Professionals

Beyond legal mandates, educators and school-based mental health professionals (school counselors, psychologists, social workers) are guided by ethical principles that emphasize the well-being, safety, and equitable treatment of all students, including those who are LGBTQIA+. Key professional organizations like the American School Counselor Association (ASCA) and the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) provide specific ethical standards relevant to supporting LGBTQIA+ youth.

Core ethical obligations include ⁵¹:

Respect and Dignity: Treating all students with dignity and respect as unique individuals, fostering and affirming their identity and psychosocial development.⁹ This includes respecting students’ affirmed names, pronouns, sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression.⁹
Equity and Non-Discrimination: Promoting equal opportunity and access to education and support services, regardless of SOGIE.⁵¹ Actively working to eliminate systemic barriers, biases, and discriminatory practices.⁵¹ Avoiding the imposition of personal biases or values.¹¹³
Safety and Well-being: Advocating for and working to establish safe, inclusive, and affirming school environments free from harassment, bullying, and discrimination.⁹ Intervening when witnessing anti-LGBTQIA+ bias or behavior.⁷⁶
Confidentiality and Privacy: Recognizing the primary ethical obligation of confidentiality to the student.¹¹³ Protecting student privacy regarding SOGIE, especially from unwarranted disclosure to parents or others, unless required by law or necessary to prevent serious, foreseeable harm.⁹ Explaining the limits of confidentiality to students in developmentally appropriate ways.¹¹³
Balancing Rights: Navigating the complex balance between the student’s right to privacy and self-determination, and the legal/inherent rights of parents/guardians to be involved in their child’s life.¹¹³ This requires careful judgment, prioritizing student safety, especially when disclosure to family could result in harm or rejection.¹¹³
Affirming Practices: Providing affirming counseling and support, advocating for inclusive policies and curriculum, and connecting students and families with appropriate resources.⁹
Professional Competence: Engaging in ongoing training and supervision to develop and maintain competence in working with LGBTQIA+ youth and understanding relevant issues.⁵¹
Avoiding Harm: Explicitly recognizing that attempting to change a student’s sexual orientation or gender identity (conversion therapy practices) is unethical, harmful, and should be opposed.⁵¹

A significant ethical challenge arises when state laws mandate actions, such as forced parental notification regarding a student’s gender identity, that conflict with professional ethical standards prioritizing student confidentiality and safety.¹¹⁶ In such situations, school counselors and psychologists face a difficult dilemma, needing to comply with the law while striving to minimize harm to the student, potentially through careful communication, seeking legal clarification, and advocating for policy changes that align with ethical best practices.

VI. Overcoming Obstacles: Navigating Resistance and Controversy

Implementing LGBTQIA+-inclusive policies and practices in schools, while crucial for student well-being, often encounters significant obstacles and resistance. Understanding these challenges and developing effective strategies for navigation is essential for creating sustainable change.

A. Identifying Common Hurdles: Resistance, Controversy, and Practical Barriers

Schools attempting to foster LGBTQIA+ inclusion frequently face a range of interconnected hurdles:

Community and Parental Opposition: Resistance often stems from conservative social or religious beliefs, fear of “promoting” LGBTQIA+ identities, concerns about age-appropriateness, or assertions of conflicting parental rights.¹ Organized groups (e.g., Moms for Liberty) may mobilize to challenge policies, curricula, books, and inclusive practices at school board meetings and through political channels.⁸⁹ This opposition can create a climate of fear, deterring supportive actions.³⁹
Political and Legislative Attacks: In recent years, there has been a surge in state-level legislation specifically targeting LGBTQIA+ students and restricting inclusive practices in schools (e.g., “Don’t Say Gay/Trans” bills, bathroom bans, sports bans, forced outing laws, curriculum censorship).²³ This creates direct legal conflicts and intense political pressure on schools.¹⁷⁴
Lack of Administrative Support: School leaders (principals, superintendents, school boards) may be unsupportive due to personal beliefs, fear of controversy, or prioritization of other issues. This lack of support can block initiatives, deny resources, and leave supportive staff feeling vulnerable.³
Staff-Related Challenges: These include lack of training and preparedness ³, staff discomfort or personal bias ³, fear of repercussions for being an ally ³, and high staff turnover which disrupts continuity and institutional knowledge.⁶⁹
Resource Scarcity: Limited funding, time constraints for staff, and inadequate physical resources (e.g., lack of single-stall restrooms) can impede the implementation of inclusive practices, training, and curriculum development.⁶⁹

These barriers are often interconnected. For example, community opposition can influence administrative support, which in turn affects resource allocation and staff willingness to act. Political attacks exacerbate fear and resource constraints. Effectively addressing these challenges requires understanding their interplay.

B. Strategies for Progress: Fostering Understanding and Building Support

Despite significant resistance, schools, educators, students, and allies can employ various strategies to navigate controversy and advance LGBTQIA+ inclusion:

Leverage Existing Policies and Legal Rights: Clearly articulate how proposed initiatives align with existing non-discrimination policies, anti-bullying laws, ethical mandates, and federal/state legal protections (Title IX, EAA, Constitution).⁸⁹ Emphasize the school’s legal obligation to protect all students.⁶⁸ Frame inclusion not as promoting an ideology, but as ensuring safety and equal opportunity.²⁶⁷
Data-Driven Advocacy: Use local and national data (e.g., from GLSEN, Trevor Project, YRBS) to demonstrate the challenges LGBTQIA+ students face in the specific school or district and the documented benefits of supportive measures on safety, mental health, and academic outcomes.⁴ Presenting evidence can counter anecdotal claims or misinformation.⁶
Build Coalitions and Allies: Engage supportive parents, educators, administrators, school board members, community leaders, faith leaders, and local/national advocacy organizations (PFLAG, GLSEN chapters, ACLU, etc.).⁴ Allies can amplify messages, provide resources, offer political cover, and speak up when targeted individuals cannot safely do so.⁶
Prioritize Educator Training: Advocate for comprehensive, ongoing professional development for all staff to build knowledge, skills, confidence, and empathy.⁶ Well-trained staff are more likely to intervene effectively and implement inclusive practices.³
Center Student Voices: Empower LGBTQIA+ students to share their experiences (when safe and voluntary) and lead initiatives like GSAs.⁵⁵ Their perspectives are powerful in illustrating the need for change.
Strategic Communication: Frame initiatives around shared values like safety, respect, fairness, and academic success for all students.⁴ Communicate proactively with families about inclusive efforts, explaining the rationale and addressing concerns transparently.⁹⁷ Hold informational sessions or panels for parents.⁶
Incremental Change: When facing strong opposition to broad policy changes, focus on incremental steps. Encourage individual teachers to adopt inclusive practices in their classrooms, build support teacher-by-teacher for respecting names/pronouns, or gradually introduce inclusive books into libraries.³⁹
Documentation: Thoroughly document incidents of discrimination, harassment, biased language, and the impact of hostile policies. Also document efforts to address these issues and any resistance encountered. This creates a record for advocacy and potential legal action.⁶
Creative Resistance: In highly restrictive environments, students and educators have found creative ways to signal support and resist erasure, such as coordinated displays of pride colors, independent student productions, or highlighting the absurdity of censorship through “hostile compliance”.¹¹⁵

Navigating these challenges requires persistence, strategic planning, and a commitment to prioritizing student safety and well-being. Building broad support networks and focusing on shared values of fairness and educational opportunity can help overcome resistance over time. Proactive efforts to educate the community and build understanding are often more effective than reacting solely to controversy after it erupts. Allyship from all members of the school community—students, parents, educators, administrators—is crucial in creating and sustaining inclusive environments.

C. Case Studies and Examples:

Real-world examples illustrate both the challenges and successful strategies in navigating LGBTQIA+ inclusion controversies:

Illinois Inclusive Curriculum Law (H.B. 246): This case study highlights the complexities of policy implementation. Despite the state mandate requiring LGBTQ+ history inclusion, educators faced challenges due to lack of specific guidance, reliance on external organizations for framing and resources, and varying levels of teacher buy-in and perceived readiness. The need for systemic support beyond just passing a law became evident.⁹⁰
Salt Lake City GSA Legal Battles: This example demonstrates the power of legal advocacy and the Equal Access Act. After initial resistance and attempts by the school district to ban or restrict GSAs, lawsuits filed by the ACLU and partner organizations ultimately affirmed students’ rights to form these clubs and receive equal treatment, leading to policy changes.²¹⁰
Florida School Board Resolution (H-11): Public comments surrounding a resolution to recognize LGBTQ+ history month revealed starkly contrasting frames. Opponents focused on narrow definitions of curriculum, parental rights, and perceived illegality (often misinterpreting state law), while supporters emphasized inclusive history, student well-being, and combating bigotry. This highlights the importance of understanding and countering opposition narratives.²⁷¹
Central Bucks School District (PA): This district faced controversy over policies barring Pride flags and requiring staff to use students’ birth names without parental permission, illustrating direct political targeting of LGBTQIA+ visibility and affirmation.²⁵⁷
Granbury ISD (TX) Book Removals: An investigation revealed superintendent directives to remove LGBTQ+-themed books, leading to community outcry, volunteer review committees, police reports alleging “pornography,” and ultimately a federal civil rights investigation. This case exemplifies the intense battles over library materials and the hostile environment created by censorship efforts.²⁶¹
Fremont County School District #1 (WY): The drafting of policies requiring parental notification for “gender concerns” and restricting facility access based on birth sex, explicitly linked to a new state “parental rights” law, shows how legislative actions directly translate into potentially harmful local policies, sparking debate about student safety versus parental control.¹¹⁷
Student Walkouts (e.g., Moore County, NC): Students organizing walkouts in protest of policies requiring forced outing demonstrate youth-led resistance and advocacy for privacy and safety, sometimes gaining administrative support for their right to protest.¹¹⁵

These examples underscore the varied nature of challenges—from legislative attacks and administrative resistance to community pressure and implementation hurdles—and the critical role of legal knowledge, community organizing, student advocacy, and persistent communication in advancing LGBTQIA+ inclusion in schools.

Conclusion: A Collective Responsibility for Affirming Futures

The evidence overwhelmingly indicates that schools play an indispensable role in the lives of LGBTQIA+ students, capable of either fostering resilience and success or exacerbating vulnerability and harm. The challenges these students face—pervasive biased language, high rates of bullying and harassment, discriminatory policies, and significant mental health disparities—are not inherent to their identities but are consequences of navigating environments often characterized by stigma, exclusion, and lack of support.³⁵ A hostile school climate directly correlates with poorer academic outcomes and diminished well-being, while affirming environments demonstrably improve safety, mental health, school connectedness, and academic achievement.⁷⁴

Creating these affirming environments is not an insurmountable task but requires a deliberate, multi-pronged approach grounded in research-backed practices. The “Four Supports” identified by GLSEN—comprehensive, enumerated non-discrimination and anti-bullying policies; supportive and well-trained educators and staff; LGBTQIA+-inclusive curriculum; and access to student-led Gender-Sexuality Alliances (GSAs)—provide a clear roadmap.⁴ Implementing these supports requires navigating a complex landscape of legal rights (including Title IX, constitutional guarantees, and the Equal Access Act) and ethical obligations, a landscape made more challenging by ongoing political controversies and evolving legal interpretations, particularly following the Bostock decision and subsequent court actions.⁸

Successfully implementing and sustaining these supports necessitates proactive strategies to overcome resistance from various sources, including community opposition and political pressure.³⁹ Building coalitions, utilizing data, centering student voices, providing robust professional development, and ensuring strong administrative leadership are key components of navigating these challenges effectively. Furthermore, all inclusion efforts must adopt an intersectional lens, recognizing and addressing the compounded challenges faced by LGBTQIA+ students of color, students with disabilities, and those holding other marginalized identities.²⁴

Ultimately, fostering schools where LGBTQIA+ students are safe, seen, and supported is a collective responsibility. It requires commitment from policymakers to enact protective laws, from administrators to lead with courage and provide resources, from educators to cultivate inclusive classrooms and intervene against bias, from mental health professionals to provide ethical and affirming care, from parents to advocate for their children and all children, and from students themselves to build supportive peer networks and advocate for change. The benefits of such environments—improved safety, better mental health, increased academic success, and a more respectful climate—extend to the entire school community.² By embracing evidence-based practices and working collaboratively, schools can fulfill their fundamental mission to provide a nurturing and equitable education for every student, ensuring that LGBTQIA+ youth have the opportunity to learn, grow, and thrive.

Works cited

Chapter 9: Education and LGBTQ+ Youth – Milne Publishing, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://milnepublishing.geneseo.edu/introlgbtqstudies/chapter/education-and-lgbtq-youth/
Safe Schools Policy for LGBTQ Students – SRCD, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.srcd.org/sites/default/files/file-attachments/spr_24_4_final.pdf
Promoting School Safety for LGBTQ and All Students – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8454913/
LGBTQ+ Resources for Supportive Administrators – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/resources-for-supportive-administrators
KEY CONCEPTS AND TERMS – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2020-04/GLSEN%20Terms%20and%20Concepts%20Thematic.pdf
pflag.org, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://pflag.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Cultivating-Respect_2021.pdf
Model Local Education Agency Policies on Implementing Title IX …, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/activity/model-local-education-agency-policies
LGBTQ+ Student Rights – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/activity/lgbtq-student-rights
The School Counselor and Transgender and Nonbinary Youth – American School Counselor Association (ASCA), accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.schoolcounselor.org/Standards-Positions/Position-Statements/ASCA-Position-Statements/The-School-Counselor-and-Transgender-Gender-noncon
Glossary of LGBTQ Terms – CARES of NY, Inc., accessed on April 21, 2025, https://caresny.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/glossary_LGBTQ_terms_condensed.pdf
PFLAG National Glossary, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://pflag.org/glossary/
& SCHOOL FACILITIES TRANSGENDER YOUTH – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/Separation_and_Stigma_2017.pdf
2024 National School Climate Survey | GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/research/2024-national-school-climate-survey
2024 National Survey on LGBTQ+ Youth Mental Health – The Trevor Project, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2024/
February 11, 2022 Submitted via www.regulations.gov The Honorable Miguel Cardona The Honorable Catherine Lhamon Secretary Assist – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2022-02/CRDC_GLSENSign-on_Comment_02112022_0.pdf
UMES Gender & Sexuality Spectrum – LGBTQ+ GUIDE – Salisbury PFLAG, accessed on April 21, 2025, http://www.salisburypflag.com/uploads/4/6/2/4/4624229/lgbtq-guide-umes.pdf
The Importance of a Positive School Climate for LGBTQ Students – OpenRiver, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://openriver.winona.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1120&context=counseloreducationcapstones
Educational Resources – North Idaho Pride Alliance, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nipridealliance.com/educational-resources
Our Trans Loved Ones – PFLAG, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://pflag.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/OTLO_2023_FINAL.pdf
Free to Be Me: A Toolkit to Protect LGBTQIA+ Students’ Rights, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.txtranskids.org/toolkit
The 2021 National School Climate Survey | GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/research/2021-national-school-climate-survey
School Climate Survey – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/school-climate-survey
“Like Walking Through a Hailstorm”: Discrimination Against LGBT …, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/report/2016/12/07/walking-through-hailstorm/discrimination-against-lgbt-youth-us-schools
New Research Details How to Support LGBTQ Youth of Color, Who Face Racism, Homophobia, and Transphobia in Schools – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/lgbtq-youth-color
New Report: Hostile School Climate for LGBTQ+ Students as Support Declines – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/news/new-report-lgbtq-students-experience-hostile-school-climates-school-support-declines
ED625378 – The 2021 National School Climate Survey: The Experiences of LGBTQ+ Youth in Our Nation’s Schools. A Report from GLSEN, Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), 2022 – ERIC, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED625378
The 2021 National School Climate Survey – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2022-10/NSCS-2021-Executive_Summary-EN.pdf
Scared of School: Even in States With Protective Laws, LGBTQ Students Are Reporting Attacks from Other Kids — and Teachers – The 74, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.the74million.org/article/scared-of-school-even-in-states-with-protective-laws-lgbtq-students-are-reporting-attacks-from-other-kids-and-teachers/
Bullying, Cyberbullying, and LGBTQ Students – Graduate School of Education, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://ed.buffalo.edu/content/dam/ed/alberti/docs/Bullying-Cyberbullying-LGBTQ-Students.pdf
Survey reveals widespread unreported bullying and discrimination among LGBTQ+ youth in schools – Theirworld, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://theirworld.org/news/survey-reveals-widespread-unreported-bullying-and-discrimination-among-lgbtq-youth-in-schools/
Pass and Implement LGBTQ-Affirming Policies – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/pass-implement-comprehensive-policies
LGBTQ+ students – Lambda Legal, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://lambdalegal.org/issues/students-rights/
LGBTIQ+ Youth: Bullying and Violence at School – UN Free & Equal, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.unfe.org/en/know-the-facts/challenges-solutions/lgbtiq-youth-bullying-and-violence-at-school
LGBTIQ+ youth: bullying and violence at school – UNESCO Digital Library, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387193
www.thetrevorproject.org, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2024/assets/static/TTP_2024_National_Survey.pdf
Health Disparities Among LGBTQ Youth | Adolescent and School Health – CDC, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/healthy-youth/lgbtq-youth/health-disparities-among-lgbtq-youth.html
LGBTQ+ Youth Data from YRBS and Beyond – Children’s Safety Network, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.childrenssafetynetwork.org/sites/default/files/LGBTQDataWebinarSlides.pdf
Bullying and Suicide Risk among LGBTQ Youth – The Trevor Project, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.thetrevorproject.org/research-briefs/bullying-and-suicide-risk-among-lgbtq-youth/
Schools Struggle to Support LGBTQ Students | Edutopia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.edutopia.org/article/schools-struggle-support-lgbtq-students/
Gay-Straight Alliances, Inclusive Policy, and School Climate: LGBTQ …, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8063225/
Harassment and Bullying | American Civil Liberties Union, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.aclu.org/issues/lgbtq-rights/lgbtq-youth/harassment-and-bullying
A Resource for LGBT Youth and Allies in Illinois Schools, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.aclu-il.org/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/beyourself_final.pdf
ACLU Remarks on Human Rights Watch Report on LGBT Youth in US Schools, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.aclusd.org/en/news/aclu-remarks-human-rights-watch-report-lgbt-youth-us-schools
Victim of Brutal LGBT Bullying in Ohio School Tells His Story | ACLU, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.aclu.org/news/lgbtq-rights/victim-brutal-lgbt-bullying-ohio-school-tells-his-story
IT’S BIGGER THAN BULLYING. – ACLU of Wisconsin, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.aclu-wi.org/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/bully_book_0.pdf
www.glsen.org, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2025-01/Avenues%20to%20Justice.pdf
School Climate for LGBTQ+ Students in Texas – GLSEN: Navigator, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://maps.glsen.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/GLSEN_2021_NSCS_State_Snapshots_TX.pdf
School Climate for LGBTQ+ Students in Wisconsin – GLSEN: Navigator, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://maps.glsen.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/GLSEN_2021_NSCS_State_Snapshots_WI.pdf
Improving School Climate for Transgender and Nonbinary Youth – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/research/improving-school-climate-transgender-and-nonbinary-youth
2023 U.S. National Survey on the Mental Health of LGBTQ+ Young People, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2023/
The School Counselor and LGBTQ+ Youth – American School Counselor Association (ASCA), accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.schoolcounselor.org/Standards-Positions/Position-Statements/ASCA-Position-Statements/The-School-Counselor-and-LGBTQ-Youth
The Effect of Negative School Climate on Academic Outcomes for …, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235336937_The_Effect_of_Negative_School_Climate_on_Academic_Outcomes_for_LGBT_Youth_and_the_Role_of_In-School_Supports
Black LGBTQ Students – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/research/black-lgbtq-students
Experiences of LGBTQ Students of Color – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/learn/research/national/report-shared-differences
Supporting LGBTQ+ Students of Color – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/activity/supporting-lgbtq-students-color
GLSEN- Erasure and Resilience: The Experiences of LGBTQ Students of Color, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nctsn.org/resources/glsen-erasure-and-resilience-the-experiences-of-lgbtq-students-of-color
Erasure and Resilience: The Experiences of LGBTQ Students of Color – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2020-03/Erasure-and-Resilience-Native-2020.pdf
Erasure and Resilience: The Experiences of LGBTQ Students of Color – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2020-06/Erasure-and-Resilience-Black-2020.pdf
Shared Differences – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2020-01/Shared_Differences_LGBT_Students_of_Color_2009.pdf
Erasure and Resilience: The Experiences of LGBTQ Students of Color – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2020-06/Erasure-and-Resilience-Latinx-2020.pdf
Reports and Briefs – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/research/reports-and-briefs
Queer Students of Color and Diversity Mandates in Public Education – Gender Policy Report – University of Minnesota, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://genderpolicyreport.umn.edu/queer-students-of-color-and-diversity-mandates-in-public-education/
LGBTQ YOUTH OF COLOR: Discipline Disparities, School Push-Out, and the School-to-Prison Pipeline – GSA Network, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://gsanetwork.org/resources/lgbtq-youth-of-color-discipline-disparities-school-push-out-and-the-school-to-prison-pipeline/
www.glsen.org, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2022-10/NSCS-2021-Full-Report.pdf
The 2017 National School Climate Survey – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/research/2017-national-school-climate-survey
2022 National Survey on LGBTQ Youth Mental Health – The Trevor Project, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2022/
Disparities in School Connectedness, Unstable Housing … – CDC, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/su/su7304a6.htm
LGBTQ+ survey for school psychologists and school counselors – JMU Scholarly Commons, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=edspec202029
LGBTQ+ Inclusion and Support: An Analysis of Challenges and Opportunities Within 4-H, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8916108/
Supporting LGBTQ+ Students in Rural Schools: Strategies for School Counselors to Enhance Protective Factors – OpenRiver, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://openriver.winona.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1212&context=counseloreducationcapstones
Outer-context determinants on the implementation of school-based interventions for LGBTQ+ adolescents – PMC, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11044576/
Impact of Executive Order Imposing Restrictions on Transgender Students in K-12 Schools, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/dei-schools-eo-impact/
The roles of school in supporting LGBTQ+ youth: A systematic review and ecological framework for understanding risk for suicide-related thoughts and behaviors, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8906061/
New Trevor Project survey finds lack of access to mental health care for LGBTQ youth, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://blog.csba.org/trevor-project-survey24/
2022 National Survey on LGBTQ Youth Mental Health by State – The Trevor Project, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.thetrevorproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/The-Trevor-Project-2022-National-Survey-on-LGBTQ-Youth-Mental-Health-by-State.pdf
Position Statement, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.isbe.net/Documents/NASP-Position-Statement.pdf
Social support in schools and related outcomes for LGBTQ youth: a scoping review – PMC, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9662773/
2023 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Results – CDC, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/yrbs/results/2023-yrbs-results.html
Position Statement, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://eqfl.org/sites/default/files/SHS-2020/SUP-RES-MAIN/POLICYS/LGBTQ_Youth.pdf
A Primer for Principals, Educators, and School Personnel – American Psychological Association, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/facts.pdf
School-Related Protective Factors for LGBTQ Middle and High School Students – The Trevor Project, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.thetrevorproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/The-Trevor-Project_School-Protective-Factors.pdf
Supporting Safe & Healthy Schools – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/schoolmentalhealth
Supporting Safe and Healthy Schools for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Students: – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/Supporting_Safe_and_Healthy_Schools_%20Mental_Health_Professionals_2019.pdf
Full article: Students in the margins: Lesbian, gay, and bi+ students’ perceptions of school climate and discrimination – Taylor & Francis Online, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19361653.2024.2310649
Addressing the Needs of LGBTQ Students – American School Counselor Association, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.schoolcounselor.org/newsletters/november-2019/addressing-the-needs-of-lgbtq-students?st=RI
Inclusive Education Benefits All Children | Learning for Justice, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.learningforjustice.org/magazine/fall-2022/inclusive-education-benefits-all-children
LGBTQ-Inclusive Curriculum as a Path to Better Public Health – American Bar Association, accessed on April 21, 2025, http://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/resources/human-rights/archive/lgbtq-inclusive-curriculum-path-better-public-health/
Full article: Which LGBTQ+ Inclusive School Strategies Support LGBTQ+ Student, Staff and Parent Perceptions of School Climate? A Latent Class Analysis, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00918369.2024.2384933
LGBTQ+ Students in PK–12 Education – Oxford Research Encyclopedias, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://oxfordre.com/education/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-1962?d=%2F10.1093%2Facrefore%2F9780190264093.001.0001%2Facrefore-9780190264093-e-1962&p=emailAAP7UnmaTU%2F7A
Inclusive Curriculum Implementation Guidance – Public Health Institute of Metropolitan Chicago, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://phimc.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ICACI_ImplementationGuidance.pdf
Inclusive Curriculum Standards – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/activity/inclusive-curricular-standards
Inclusive Learning: – A Synthesis of 20+ years of Research on the Education and Wellbeing Impacts of Inclusive Curriculum, Instruction, and School Books – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2024-06/Inclusive%20Learning%20Research%20Brief_0.pdf
Best Practices for Gender and Sexuality Alliance Clubs – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/gsa-study/best-practices
Respect for All: Policy Recommendations to Support LGBTQ Students | GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/activity/respect-all-policy-recommendations-support-lgbtq-students
www.glsen.org, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2022-06/GSA-BestPractices-061622.pdf
Respect for All: Policy Recommendations to Support LGBTQ Students A Guide for District and School Leaders – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/GLSEN-Respect-For-All-Policy-Resource.pdf
Navigating LGBT Issues | NASSP, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nassp.org/publication/principal-leadership/volume-16-2015-2016/principal-leadership-december-2015/navigating-lgbt-issues/
Supportive Schools for LGBTQ+ Students: – Southern Equality, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://southernequality.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/SupportiveSchoolsforLGBTQStudentsGuide.pdf
Safe Schools Laws – Family Equality, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://familyequality.org/resources/safe-schools-laws/
NASP – Position Statement – NATIONAL – NET, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://clubrunner.blob.core.windows.net/00000100906/en-ca/files/homepage/glsen-4/GLSEN-4.pdf
legacy.lambdalegal.org, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://legacy.lambdalegal.org/sites/default/files/publications/downloads/osr-admin_out-safe-respected-for-administrators_0.pdf
Legal Rights for LGBTQ+ Employees & Students – California Teachers Association, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cta.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/LGBTQ-Legal-Rights-Pamphlet_March2023.pdf
Fidelity of Implementation of a State Antibullying Policy With a Focus on Protected Social Classes, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://wjhall.web.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/11637/2016/02/Fidelity-of-Implementation-of-a-State-Antibullying-Policy-With-a-Focus-on-Protected-Social-Classes.pdf
School Climate and Senate File 496, Iowa’s “Don’t Say Gay” legislation – ERIC, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1457430.pdf
Power and resistance in schools: Implementing institutional change …, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9979782/
implementing lessons that matter – GSA Network, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://gsanetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Implementing_Lessons.pdf
Power and resistance in schools: Implementing institutional change to promote health equity for sexual and gender minority youth – Frontiers, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/health-services/articles/10.3389/frhs.2022.920790/pdf
Nonbinary Gender Identity Statistics Among Youth – The Trevor Project, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.thetrevorproject.org/research-briefs/diversity-of-nonbinary-youth/
Creating Safe Spaces for LGBTQIA+ Youth in Schools – Maryland State Department of Education, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://marylandpublicschools.org/about/Documents/DSFSS/SSSP/SafeSpaces/Creating-Safe-Spaces-Memo-A.pdf
Position Statement – Texas Association of School Psychologists, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.txasp.org/assets/conference-materials/2017/pompei%202017.pdf
NASP – Position Statement – Portland Public Schools, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.pps.net/cms/lib/OR01913224/Centricity/Domain/1101/Packet2.pdf
LGBTQ+ Student Support – Education Degree, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.educationdegree.com/resources/supporting-lgbtqia-students/
ASCA Ethical Standards for School Counselors, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.schoolcounselor.org/About-School-Counseling/Ethical-Responsibilities/ASCA-Ethical-Standards-for-School-Counselors-(1)
Mapping Attacks on LGBTQ Rights in U.S. State Legislatures in 2025 | American Civil Liberties Union, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.aclu.org/legislative-attacks-on-lgbtq-rights-2025
The Resistance to Anti-LGBTQ+ School Policy is Emerging – Stories …, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://southernequality.org/stories-from-the-south/
A Backlash of Anti-LGBTQ Legislation – American School Counselor Association (ASCA), accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.schoolcounselor.org/Magazines/May-June-2021/A-Backlash-of-Anti-LGBTQ-Legislation
Parental-rights law impacting school notification, transgender …, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://wyofile.com/parental-rights-law-impacting-school-notification-transgender-policies/
For Helping Educators & School Providers To Provide Guidance & Support For Parents & Caregivers Of LGBTQ* Students – Family Acceptance Project, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://familyproject.sfsu.edu/sites/default/files/documents/FAP_Q%26A%20for%20Educators%20%26%20School%20Providers_Increasing%20Family%20Support%20for%20LGBTQ%20Students2.pdf
For Alabama School Counselors are there any state laws that contradict professional ethics or standards as defined by ASCA? – Reddit, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Alabama/comments/1gzu5ro/for_alabama_school_counselors_are_there_any_state/
www.schoolcounselor.org, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.schoolcounselor.org/getmedia/44f30280-ffe8-4b41-9ad8-f15909c3d164/EthicalStandards.pdf
HRC.im/BackToSchool All educators and youth-serving professionals have an ethical obligation to ensure that each young person fe – AWS, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://hrc-prod-requests.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/2023-BTS-Project-Thrive-Checklist-4.pdf
Claim Your Rights – PFLAG – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/activity/claim-your-rights-pflag
U.S. Department of Education Toolkit: Creating Inclusive and Nondiscriminatory School Environments for LGBTQI+ Students, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/lgbtqi-student-resources-toolkit-062023.pdf
LGBTQ+ Support & Protection | NEA – National Education Association, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nea.org/advocating-for-change/racial-social-justice/tools-justice/lgbtq-support-protection
Lambda Legal Applauds Biden Administration Rule Clarifying Title IX Protects LGBTQ+ Students in School, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://lambdalegal.org/newsroom/us_20240419_lambda-legal-applauds-biden-administration-rule-clarifying-title-ix-protects-lgbtq-students-in-school/
ACLU Comment on U.S. Department of Education’s Final Title IX Rule | American Civil Liberties Union, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/155090
Victory! Title IX Protects Transgender Students – ACLU, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.aclu.org/news/lgbtq-rights/victory-title-ix-protects-transgender-students
Best School Practices for Success Resources for Transgender Youth, Advocates, and Parents – ACLU of Illinois, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.aclu-il.org/sites/default/files/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Resources-for-Transgender-Youth-FINAL.pdf
A Refuge for LGBTQ+ Young People | Learning for Justice, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.learningforjustice.org/magazine/spring-2023/a-refuge-for-lgbtq-young-people
Inclusive Curriculum | GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/inclusive-curriculum
Inclusive Curriculum Guide | GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/activity/inclusive-curriculum-guide
DEVELOPING LGBTQ-INCLUSIVE CLASSROOM RESOURCES – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/GLSEN_LGBTQ_Inclusive_Curriculum_Resource_2019_0.pdf
GLSEN Rainbow Library Elementary Lesson Plans, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://rainbowlibrary.org/lessons/
Inclusive Learning – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/research/inclusive-learning
GLSEN’s Latest Research Brief Demonstrates the Power of Inclusive Learning for LGBTQ+ Youth, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/news/glsens-latest-research-brief-demonstrates-power-inclusive-learning-lgbtq-youth
Teachers Are Divided on Teaching LGBTQ Topics – Education Week, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.edweek.org/leadership/educators-divided-on-whether-schools-should-teach-about-lgbtq-topics-survey-finds/2021/12
Policy Maps – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/policy-maps
Educators Need LGBTQ-Supportive Administrators – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/blog/educators-need-lgbtq-supportive-administrators
ADDRESSING THE NEEDS OF LGBTQ+ STUDENTS – Texas Association of School Psychologists, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.txasp.org/assets/TASP%20Power%20of%20One%20Slides.pdf
ANTI-GAY CURRICULUM LAWS – Columbia Law Review -, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://columbialawreview.org/content/anti-gay-curriculum-laws/
Code-switching queer controversy: Pre-K-8 educators’ perceptions of LGBT-inclusive policy framing, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/download/8503/3409/39796
Code-switching queer controversy: Pre-K-8 educators’ perceptions of LGBT-inclusive policy framing – ERIC, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1437316.pdf
Keshet and External Resources, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.keshetonline.org/keshet-and-external-resources/
Why Say Gay? K-3 Lessons & Resources – AWS, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://hrc-prod-requests.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/welcoming-schools/documents/WS-Why-Say-Gay-K-3-Lessons-Resources.pdf
Welcoming Schools: An LGBT-Inclusive Approach for Family Diversity, Gender and Bullying – National PTA, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.pta.org/From_S3/Programs/FamilyEngagement/PDF%20Embracing%20Family%20Diversity%20HRC%20PTA%20LGBTQ%20Webinar.pdf
LGBTQ Back-to-School Resources: 2022 Edition – Mombian, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://mombian.com/2022/08/09/lgbtq-back-to-school-resources-2022-edition/
National Day of Reading | American Association of School Librarians, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.ala.org/aasl/advocacy/promo/welcoming-schools
Welcoming Schools Back-to-School Kit – AWS, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://hrc-prod-requests.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/FINAL-Welcoming-Schools-Back-to-School-Kit-2022-23-8.8.22.pdf
12 Ways to Make Your Classroom Safe for LGBTQ+ Students – Teacher Created Materials, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.teachercreatedmaterials.com/free-spirit-publishing/blog/12-ways-to-make-your-classroom-safe-for-lgbtq-students
Human Relations, Diversity and Equity / EL School LGBTQ+ Book List & Lesson Plan, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.lausd.org/Page/20564
Teacher Resources – Georgia Safe Schools Coalition, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://gasafeschools.org/teacher-resources
Health and Other Curriculum Materials – Professional Learning (CA Dept of Education), accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cde.ca.gov/pd/ee/c1f.asp
WS Creating LGBTQ+ Inclusive Schools Booklist for Elementary – AWS, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://hrc-prod-requests.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/welcoming-schools/documents/WS-Creating-LGBTQ-Inclusive-Schools-Booklist-for-Elementary.pdf
Resources for Schools and Districts – Kinder Future, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.kinderfuture.org/resources-resources-for-schools-and-districts
National Day of Reading Celebrates ‘Stories Supporting Transgender and Non-Binary Youth’ – Daily Citizen, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/national-day-of-reading-celebrates-stories-supporting-transgender-and-non-binary-youth/
Welcoming Schools – InfluenceWatch, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.influencewatch.org/organization/welcoming-schools/
Educator Resources – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/resources/educator-resources
Moving from Inaction to Action: Challenging Homo- and Transphobia in Middle School English Language Arts, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://journals.uvm.edu/mgr/article/74/galley/76/view/
BOARD OF EDUCATION RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, it is the right of every child, regardless of gender identity, gender expression, int, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nea.org/sites/default/files/2024-12/sample-board-resolution-for-lgbtq-issues-updated.pdf
BEST PRACTICES FOR SERVING LGBTQ STUDENTS – Learning for Justice, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.learningforjustice.org/sites/default/files/2018-09/TT-LGBTQ-Best-Practices-Guide.pdf
Does a Decade of School Administrator Support for Educator Training on Students’ Sexual and Gender Identity Make a Difference for Students’ Victimization and Perceptions of School Climate? – PubMed Central, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9171694/
GLSEN Safe Space Kit, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/GLSEN%20Safe%20Space%20Kit.pdf
Guide to Being an Ally to LGBT Students – ERIC, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED512337.pdf
Perspective | Teacher allyship: LGBTQ+ student voices in school – EdNC, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.ednc.org/perspective-teacher-allyship-lgbtq-student-voices-in-school/
A Guide to Supporting Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Students in Your School – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/GLSEN%20English%20SafeSpace%20Book%20Text%20Updated%202019.pdf
The Relationship Between Caring Teachers and the Mental Health of LGBTQ+ Students, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.thetrevorproject.org/research-briefs/the-relationship-between-caring-teachers-and-the-mental-health-of-lgbtq-students/
5 Ways Educators Can Help Support LGBTQ+ Students, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.tc.columbia.edu/articles/2022/october/5-ways-educators-can-help-support-lgbtq-students/
Creating Safer Spaces in Schools for LGBTQ+ Young People | The Trevor Project, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.thetrevorproject.org/resources/guide/creating-safer-spaces-in-schools-for-lgbtq-young-people/
Lead Changes for LGBTQ+ Students – American School Counselor Association (ASCA), accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.schoolcounselor.org/Magazines/November-December-2022/Lead-Changes-for-LGBTQ-Students
Impact of Geographical and Demographic Factors of Clinical/ Social Preparedness, Attitudes, and Basic Knowledge of Secondary School Counselors – Digital Scholarship@Texas Southern University, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://digitalscholarship.tsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1073&context=dissertations
Chapter 1 ETHICS IN SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY : AN INTRODUCTION – COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://catalogimages.wiley.com/images/db/pdf/0471757705.excerpt.pdf
Supporting All Students, Including LGBTQ Students – Office of the Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.doe.mass.edu/commissioner/spec-advisories/2025-0207supporting-all-students.html
Implementing Evidence-Informed Practices to Make Schools Safer and More Supportive of Sexual and Gender Minority Youth – PMC, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8903090/
Actions against LGBTQ+ students also threaten K-12 teachers – Brookings Institution, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/actions-against-lgbtq-students-also-threaten-k-12-teachers/
Full article: Navigating Queer Narratives: Student Teachers’ Perspectives on LGBT+ Picture Books – Taylor & Francis Online, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00918369.2024.2428261
Professional Development | GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/professional-development
School Staff Training to Support LGBTQ+ Youth – California Department of Education, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cde.ca.gov/pd/ee/c1e.asp
Interactive LGBTQ Sensitivity Training for Supportive Adults – The Trevor Project, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.thetrevorproject.org/care-training/
Year One Evaluation of the New York City Department of Education “Respect for All” Training Program – ResearchGate, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235336796_Year_One_Evaluation_of_the_New_York_City_Department_of_Education_Respect_for_All_Training_Program
Year One Evaluation of the New York City Department of Education Respect for All Training Program, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED512335.pdf
Evaluation of GLSEN’s Safe Space Kit, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/research/evaluation-glsens-safe-space-kit
www.glsen.org, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/Evaluation_of_Safe_Space_Kit_2012.pdf
LGBTQ Ally Training for Youth-Serving Professionals – The Trevor Project, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.thetrevorproject.org/ally-training/
How can schools cultivate school belonging for LGBTQIA+ youth? – HEDCO Institute, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://hedcoinstitute.uoregon.edu/blog/2/lgbtqia-school-belonging
Supporting LGBTQ+ Students – Professional Learning (CA Dept of Education), accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/pl/supportlgbtq.asp
Safe Schools Program for LGBTQ students | Mass.gov, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.mass.gov/info-details/safe-schools-program-for-lgbtq-students
Professional Development for Educators – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/research/professional-development-educators
(PDF) Building LGBTQ awareness and allies in our teacher education community and beyond – ResearchGate, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276268084_Building_LGBTQ_awareness_and_allies_in_our_teacher_education_community_and_beyond
Addressing Sexual Orientation and Professional Ethics in the Training Of School Psychologists in School and University Settings | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237562225_Addressing_Sexual_Orientation_and_Professional_Ethics_in_the_Training_Of_School_Psychologists_in_School_and_University_Settings
The development, implementation, and evaluation of an LGTBQ ally training for mental health professionals – Iowa Research Online, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://iro.uiowa.edu/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode=01IOWA_INST&filePid=13893172590002771&download=true
GSA Resources – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/support-student-gsas
What is a GSA club?, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://gsanetwork.org/what-is-a-gsa/
HANDBOOK – GSA Network, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://gsanetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/GSA_Advisor_Handbook-web.pdf
How to Support Gender & Sexuality Alliances in Schools – Teach.com, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://teach.com/resources/supporting-lgbtq-affirming-school-organizations/
Forming a GSA in Pennsylvania – The Pennsylvania Youth Congress, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://payouthcongress.org/at-school/forming-a-gsa/
GSA Support – Outright Vermont, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://outrightvt.org/gsa-support
Building an Inclusive GSA – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2023-02/GLSEN_GSA_Resources_2023_Building_Inclusive_GSA.pdf
RESEARCH BRIEF – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2020-04/Gay-Straight%20Alliances_0.pdf
The GSA Study: – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2021-12/GLSEN_ResearchInstitute_GSAStudy_12012021.pdf
Initiating and Sustaining GSAs Across the District as Part of a Vision for Equity: A Case Study in Chicago Public Schools – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11693822/
Student and GSA Resources – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/resources/student-and-gsa-resources
(PDF) Initiating and Sustaining GSAs Across the District as Part of a Vision for Equity: A Case Study in Chicago Public Schools – ResearchGate, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387228733_Initiating_and_Sustaining_GSAs_Across_the_District_as_Part_of_a_Vision_for_Equity_A_Case_Study_in_Chicago_Public_Schools
Youth Advocacy Varies in Relation to Adult Advisor Characteristics and Practices in Gender-Sexuality Alliances – PMC, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9354611/
“Safe Space” or “Brave Space”: How GSAs can Address Intersectionality, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.communitypsychology.com/safe-space-or-brave-space-how-gsas-can-address-intersectionality/
The Substance and Circumstances of Race and Immigration Talk in High School Gender & Sexuality Alliances, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8566315/
Youth-Based Gender, Sexuality, and Race Equity Work in Secondary Schools | Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://oxfordre.com/education/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-1308?p=emailAowmyDXsjpBvo&d=/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-1308
GSA NETWORK RESOURCE PACKET, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://gsanetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/2018AR_ONLINE.pdf
RESEARCH BRIEF – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/learn/reasearch/national/gsa-brief
Salon: High Schools with gay-straight alliances have reduced risk of student suicide | ACLU of Illinois, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.aclu-il.org/en/news/salon-high-schools-gay-straight-alliances-have-reduced-risk-student-suicide
East High Gay/Straight Alliance v. Board of Education and East High School PRISM Club v. Cynthia L. Seidel (1999) | ACLU of Utah, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.acluutah.org/en/cases/east-high-gaystraight-alliance-v-board-education-and-east-high-school-prism-club-v-cynthia-l
The Right to Establish a GSA in Public Schools: A Basic Primer – GLAD Law, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glad.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/GSA-Public-Schools.pdf
GSA Network, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://gsanetwork.org/
Elements of a GSA – GSAFE, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://gsafewi.org/resources/elements-of-a-gsa/
11 Things your School’s GSA can do! – OK2BME, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://ok2bme.ca/11-things-your-schools-gsa-can-do/
High School GSA Activity Ideas : r/lgbt – Reddit, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/lgbt/comments/pe7cv4/high_school_gsa_activity_ideas/
The GLSEN Jump-StartGuide, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://eqfl.org/sites/default/files/Jumpstart1.pdf
10 Steps to Start Your GSA – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/activity/10-steps-start-your-gsa
Virtual GSA Activity Ideas, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://egale.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Activity-Ideas-for-a-Virtual-GSA-2.0.pdf
FUN THINGS TO DO WITH YOUR GSA, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://gsanetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/FunThingsToDo.pdf
Activities and other ideas for a school GSA? – lgbt – Reddit, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/lgbt/comments/19a4w5s/activities_and_other_ideas_for_a_school_gsa/
TWO WRONGS DON’T MAKE A RIGHT: – GSA Network, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://gsanetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Two-Wrongs-Dont-Make-a-Right-Why-Zero-Tolerance-is-Not-the-Solution-to-Bullying-smaller.pdf
Fostering school safety and valuing intersectional identities: Promoting Black queer youths’ sense of belonging in schools – American Psychological Association, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.apa.org/pubs/highlights/spotlight/issue-294
Helping LGBTQ+ Students Navigate Intersectionality in the Classroom – Kaleidoscope, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.kaleidoscopelgbtq.org/helping-lgbtq-students-navigate-intersectionality-in-the-classroom/
Making Your GSA Inclusive of Black LGBTQ+ Students – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/activity/making-your-gsa-inclusive-black-lgbtq-students
The historic Bostock opinion and LGBTQ rights in schools – Kappan Online, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://kappanonline.org/historic-bostock-opinion-scotus-lgbtq-rights-schools-kim/
transgender students and policy in k-12 public schools: acknowledging historical harms – ERIC, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED620507.pdf
Title IX Litigation Tracker: 2024 Title IX Regulations Vacated by District Court, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.k-12legalinsights.com/2025/01/title-ix-litigation-tracker-2024-title-ix-regulations-vacated-by-district-court/
Federal judge in Texas expands ruling that blocks Biden administration protections of LGBTQ students, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.texastribune.org/2024/08/14/federal-title-ix-ruling-lgbtq-protections/
What Schools Need to Know After Court Vacates Title IX Regulations Nationally, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.jacksonlewis.com/insights/what-schools-need-know-after-court-vacates-title-ix-regulations-nationally
1 Joint Guidance on Federal Title IX Regulations Discussion of the Effect of Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia February 25, 202 – SUNY System Administration, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://system.suny.edu/media/suny/content-assets/documents/sci/tix2020/Note-on-Bostock-updated-2025.pdf
One Year Later: The Impact of Bostock v. Clayton County, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.theusconstitution.org/blog/one-year-later-the-impact-of-bostock-v-clayton-county/
Legal & Ethical – American School Counselor Association (ASCA), accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.schoolcounselor.org/Magazines/Legal-Ethical
How The Law Protects LGBTQ Youth | Lambda Legal Legacy, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://legacy.lambdalegal.org/know-your-rights/article/youth-how-the-law-protects
Judge Strikes Down Title IX Guidance on LGBTQ+ Students. Here’s Why It Matters, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/judge-strikes-down-title-ix-guidance-on-lgbtq-students-heres-why-it-matters/2024/06
Texas Court Blocks 2021 Title IX Guidance on LGBTQ Issues: What Does This Mean for the 2024 Title IX Rules? – Civil Rights Classroom, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://titleixtips.com/texas-court-blocks-2021-title-ix-guidance-on-lgbtq-issues-what-does-this-mean-for-the-2024-title-ix-rules/
Final Title IX rule enshrines protections for LGBTQI+ students | Higher Ed Dive, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.highereddive.com/news/education-department-final-title-ix-rule-2024-2022-lgbtq-protections/713684/
Title IX – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/title-ix
The New Title IX Regulation and Legal Battles Over It, Explained – Education Week, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/the-new-title-ix-regulation-and-legal-battles-over-it-explained/2024/09
TITLE IX DEBATE & CONTINUED PROTECTIONS FOR SEX BASED DISCRIMINATION UNDER THE PHRA – Education Law Center, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.elc-pa.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/2024-09-PHRC-Presentation-Title-9-Rule-PHRA-1.pdf
Education – Movement Advancement Project |, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.lgbtmap.org/policy-and-issue-analysis/education
Bostock v. Clayton County – New Georgia Encyclopedia, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/government-politics/bostock-v-clayton-county/
Legal Protections for LGBT People After Bostock v. Clayton County – Williams Institute, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/state-nd-laws-after-bostock/
REDEFINING WHAT IT MEANS TO DISCRIMINATE BECAUSE OF SEX: BOSTOCK’S EQUAL PROTECTION IMPLICATIONS – Columbia Law Review, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://columbialawreview.org/content/redefining-what-it-means-to-discriminate-because-of-sex-bostocks-equal-protection-implications/
How the Impact of Bostock v. Clayton County on LGBTQ Rights …, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/how-the-impact-of-bostock-v-clayton-county-on-lgbtq-rights-continues-to-expand
How the Impact of Bostock v. Clayton County on LGBTQ Rights Continues to Expand | ACLU of Florida, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.aclufl.org/en/news/how-impact-bostock-v-clayton-county-lgbtq-rights-continues-expand
Title IX: Impacts of Legal Challenges and Executive Orders – ACSA Resource Hub, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://content.acsa.org/title-ix-impacts-of-legal-challenges-and-executive-orders/
Title IX Ruling Limits Definition of “Sex” in Education Parity, May Impact Employers, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.lowndes-law.com/newsroom/insights/federal-courts-title-ix-ruling-may-impact-employers-beyond-education
What Should Educational Institutions Do Next for Title IX Now That Biden’s Final Rule Was Blocked by a Federal Judge? | Littler, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.littler.com/news-analysis/asap/what-should-educational-institutions-do-next-title-ix-now-bidens-final-rule-was
U.S. Department of Education Confirms It Will Enforce 2020 Title IX Rule and Regulations Following District Court Ruling and Executive Order, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.pbwt.com/publications/u-s-department-of-education-confirms-it-will-enforce-2020-title-ix-rule-and-regulations-following-district-court-ruling-and-executive-order
Why aren’t lower courts using Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) in recent title ix decisions? : r/supremecourt – Reddit, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/supremecourt/comments/1eigocq/why_arent_lower_courts_using_bostock_v_clayton/
Federal judge tosses Biden administration’s Title IX guidance aimed at protecting LGBTQ+ students | Courthouse News Service, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.courthousenews.com/federal-judge-tosses-biden-administrations-title-ix-guidance-aimed-at-protecting-lgbtq-students/
Federal judge strikes down Biden’s Title IX rules protecting LGBTQ+ students – VPM, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.vpm.org/news/2025-01-13/federal-judge-strikes-down-bidens-title-ix-rules-protecting-lgbtq-students
Federal judge blocks Title IX rule in 4 states | K-12 Dive, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.k12dive.com/news/biden-title-ix-rule-lgbtq-protections-preliminary-injunction/719043/
Days from Start of New Title IX Rule, Courts Offer Divided Map of Red and Blue – The 74, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.the74million.org/article/days-from-start-of-new-title-ix-rule-courts-offer-divided-map-of-red-and-blue/
Education Litigation Update – February 2025 – Quinn Emanuel, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.quinnemanuel.com/the-firm/publications/education-litigation-update-february-2025/
LGBTQ+ Students Feel the Weight of a Push for Parents’ Rights – Education Week, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.edweek.org/leadership/lgbtq-students-feel-the-weight-of-a-push-for-parents-rights/2023/09
As conservatives target schools, LGBTQ+ kids and students of color feel less safe – AP News, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/lgbtq-race-ban-schools-4c4df1728f5265eee3684268035570c2
Responding to “Don’t Say Gay” Laws in the US: Research Priorities and Considerations for Health Equity, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9666954/
Queer(ing) and Trans(ing) Critical Media Literacies in Response to Anti-lgbtqia+ Legislation and Policies in – Brill, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://brill.com/view/journals/jcml/3/2/article-p73_001.xml
New Poll Shows Massive Public Backlash to Anti-LGBTQ School Policies | Truthout, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://truthout.org/articles/new-poll-shows-massive-public-backlash-to-anti-lgbtq-school-policies/
Granbury ISD faces federal investigation over LGBTQ book removals | The Texas Tribune, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.texastribune.org/2022/12/20/granbury-books-investigation-civil-rights/
2021 State Snapshots from the National School Climate Survey – GLSEN, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.glsen.org/research/2021-state-snapshots-national-school-climate-survey
School Counselors Applying the ASCA 2016 Ethical Standards – Journal of Counseling Research and Practice – eGrove, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://egrove.olemiss.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1041&context=jcrp
ASCA Ethical Standards: Interpretation and Application – Wisconsin School Counselor Association, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.wscaweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/0bf74c046ad94d9f78703a05cf78db21.pdf
PowerPoint Presentation – Alabama School Counselor Association, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://alabamaschoolcounselors.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Upton-Ethical-and-Legal-Issues-in-For-School-Counselors.pptx
Protecting Transgender and Non-Binary Students Through School District Policy Development: A Case Study of 16 Districts – Issuu, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://issuu.com/revieweditor/docs/engage_for_change_journal/s/19701802
Gay rights and school policy: A case study in community factors that facilitate or impede educational change – ResearchGate, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254308945_Gay_rights_and_school_policy_A_case_study_in_community_factors_that_facilitate_or_impede_educational_change
LGBTQ+ Youth Experiences in Education: What it Means to be Queer – UW Tacoma Digital Commons, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=med_theses
Navigating parental rights: A study of Virginia’s model policies on transgender student treatment, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/download/8166/3227/37081
Tilling the Soil for LGBTQ Inclusive Policies: A Case Study of One School’s Attempt to Bring – University of Colorado Boulder, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://scholar.colorado.edu/downloads/8049g520v
Local School Boards and LGBTQ Policy Decisions: A Qualitative Case Study – MDPI, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5118/4/3/28
Attack on LGBTQ+ rights: The politics and psychology of a backlash – Berkeley News, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://news.berkeley.edu/2022/05/02/attack-on-lgbtq-rights-the-politics-and-psychology-of-a-backlash/
How the conservative parents’ rights movement — fueled by LGBTQ backlash — is shaping Heidi Ganahl’s campaign – Colorado Public Radio, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.cpr.org/2022/10/20/heidi-ganahl-parents-rights-lgbtq-schools/
Exposing the Color-Evasive/Tolerance Framing Tactics of Educational Actors Amidst Anti-CRT/LGBTQ + Rhetoric and Policy – ResearchGate, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390882830_Exposing_the_Color-EvasiveTolerance_Framing_Tactics_of_Educational_Actors_Amidst_Anti-CRTLGBTQ_Rhetoric_and_Policy
The Culture War’s Impact on Public Schools | NEA – National Education Association, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/culture-wars-impact-public-schools
A Path to Inclusion: An LGBTQ+ Educator’s Journey | NEA, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/path-inclusion-lgbtq-educators-journey
1 BOARD OF EDUCATION RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, it is the right of every child, regardless of gender identity, gender expression, o, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://www.nea.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/Sample%20Board%20Resolution%20for%20LGBTQ%2B.pdf
The Impact of Anti-DEI Legislation on LGBTQ+ Faculty in Higher Education, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/anti-dei-laws-higher-ed/
Why Education Reporters Should Approach Rising Anti-LGBTQ Sentiments As a Public Health Issue – ewa.org, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://ewa.org/how-to-cover-the-story/why-education-reporters-should-approach-rising-anti-lgbtq-sentiments-as-a-public-health-issue
Code-switching queer controversy: Pre-K-8 educators’ perceptions of LGBT-inclusive policy framing, accessed on April 21, 2025, https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/8503/3458

Post Views: 6

The Essential Role of Schools in Supporting LGBTQIA+ Students

The Imperative to Support LGBTQIA+ Students in Schools

Works cited

Related Posts

Stories of Strength and Resilience in the LGBTQIA+ Community

Exploring the Diversity within the LGBTQIA+ Spectrum

LGBTQIA+ Icons Who Paved the Way for Equality and Acceptance

Mental Health Challenges and Triumphs in LGBTQIA+ Lives

Leave a reply Cancel reply